• madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    And PragerU is approved in certain schools as teaching materials… It’s not funny, it’s fuckin dangerous!

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    The indigenous populations that were first enslaved by the spanish colonists were literally worked to the death. The spaniards were so cruel that the natives would often kill themselves when capture was imminent.

    “There are fates worse than death”

  • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    Explanation and some thoughts: First, I would like to note, in unfortunate if mild agreement with the PragerU bullshit, that the development of slavery in settled societies was an improvement over genociding all the defeated enemies. As societies develop, conflicts with ever-further-flung foes means that societies cannot integrate peoples who are extremely hostile and culturally distinct into the polity without extensive assimilative institutions, which are fairly late developments in most societies. This leaves either expelling the enemies, murdering them, or reducing their ability to resist (ie through the restriction of their liberty). As population densities increase, expulsion ceases to be an option - leaving only murder or reduction of the defeated’s state. This is not an excuse for the individuals who participate in the institution of slavery (with the odd reinforcing note that even in many slaver societies, slave traders and overseers are seen as utter scum), but that, on a societal level, slavery is an unfortunate lesser evil compared to genocide. This is a large part of the reason why slavery is so widespread in human history, across vastly different cultures and regions, and in societies where the economic influence of slavery remains minimal.

    HOWEVER

    First, the Atlantic Slave Trade was not based on this unfortunate development of early human society - it was the trade of flesh for cash by European societies which not only had developed means of overcoming resistance by legal institutions WITHOUT resorting to slavery, like earlier polities, but were not even seriously involved in the wars on the African continent at the time, making their involvement purely and objectively a fucking evil, not even a lesser evil like early slavery, but a greater one. The Europeans fueled wars between African tribes on the continent (who were largely restricted by the aforementioned circumstances making slavery the least-bad option after intense wars) all in the name of buying cheap slave labor, because the prospect of paying a decent share to their own Filthy Poors™ was too much for their precious little pocketbooks to handle.

    Second, Christopher Columbus was a piece of shit by the standards of a time wherein we would regard the ‘baseline’ of behavior as representing total pieces of shit. Not only was he a slaver before he became a explorer, but when he found and was welcomed by the people of the Caribbean with gifts and supplies after a long journey, his first instinct was to plunder, murder, and enslave them. If that wasn’t bad enough, his treatment of them after being granted control of the region was so abhorrent that the Spanish crown, itself hardly a bastion of humane treatment and sentiment, stripped him of his position on grounds of cruelty.

    And third, offering someone a choice between slavery and death for the crime of existing while being weaker is not a fucking good thing, and certainly not something that a fucking children’s ‘educational’ program should be playing apologist for. The ‘nuances’ of slavery should not exactly be high on the fucking curriculum.

    • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Getting punched in the shoulder is better than a kick to the face, no?”

      “Why are you hitting me?”

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Minor correction, the Spanish crown objected to him enslaving Christians which is a major violation of Canonical Law. They would have been fine had he enslaved them but after making them Christian subjects of Spain it was a bridge too far.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        I thought part of his behavior was preventing natives from being baptized specifically so he could legally enslave them.

        It’s not a core period/subject of interest of mine, so I might be remembering wrong.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      If that wasn’t bad enough, his treatment of them after being granted control of the region was so abhorrent that the Spanish crown, itself hardly a bastion of humane treatment and sentiment, stripped him of his position on grounds of cruelty.

      My understanding is that he was stripped of his position because of what he did to his European subjects and because his rival wanted to take his place, and that hardly anyone back in Europe gave a shit about his abuse of native people. Is that not correct?

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        His rival wanting to take his place was definitely part of it, but his abuses against the native peoples were recounted in great and horrific detail as core accusations of his unfitness for the position of governor.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      You forgot the party where Columbus was going to be EXECUTED by the Crown, and may have only been saved by being friends with Queen Isabella.

    • Malta Soron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      To add, slaves generally did work which was very unhealthy, either because of the work itself or the environment (heat, diseases). IIRC (it’s been a while since university) most slaves in the Caribbean died within years, generating a constant demand for new slaves.

      Plantation holders were always looking for cheap labour from any source (compare indentured servitude), but it was a hard sell compared to the North American colonies.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Reminds me of the Danish colonies. After the king declared an end to slavery in 10 years (iirc) the plantation owners cranked up the cruelty to extract as much wealth as possible.

        The enslaved were dying at much high rates and actually lead to the first slave revolt on the islands.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Or we just need to teach he was banned from Spain upon pain of death for enslaving the natives he converted to Christianity. Within the context of his time he was a bad guy.

      • rafoix@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It won’t happen. Christians will fight endlessly to protect the positive and completely false image of the man.

        It’ll be easier to make a single film which would be put on Christian ban lists which will make it much more widespread and popular than any historical movie.

        • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Christians aren’t fighting for this. Remember there are over a billion Christians who don’t care about him at all. It’s really weird that you are making that association.

          • rafoix@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Catholics and the massive amount of weirdos that call correct history lessons “woke” mostly fall under the Christian umbrella. They all defend Columbus Day.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Also, absolutely fucking wild to think anyone has ever had to choose between doing these two things, him especially. Motherfucker you could’ve just traded with them then went home

  • 20cello@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    in Italian schools, when teaching the history of the discovery of America, Christopher Columbus is described as a hero…

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I learned in the US that he was a mixed bag, but no specifics, until I took a history class in Spanish in college. It could be the language difference or the fact that it wasn’t a Catholic school (edit: or honestly, it could have been that instructors are less likely to get angry calls about nightmares in college), but that’s the first place that we got accurate information about him.

      We read his journals, which should be possible with a B2 Spanish (but I suspect Italian would also help, because Columbus was pretty confused about Spanish/italian/portuguese and the journals have a lot of idiosyncratic vocabulary), and they’re stomach turning. He was a fucking monster.

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        The Roman Catholic Church of the time would not have approved of Columbus enslaving Christians so it is weird your RC schools praised him.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          They didn’t praise him exactly, they said he was a bad person who did great things. They just didn’t go into detail about the horrific things he also did.

      • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        In the Northeast US we definitely learned about him as a hero, but people (at least my age in my area) seemed too pretty quickly, accept that he wasn’t as good as we had originally learned.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      French schools too. In 1992 Columbus was a huge deal, we spent a lot of time staging a play about his first voyage, and he was of course depicted as a righteous hero. I was just a lowly soldier, in hindsight I’m glad they didn’t make us reenact the actual events, shit would’ve scarred me for life…

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Taíno chiefs in Cuba did not respond to Hatuey’s message, and few joined him to fight.

      :(

      [Hatuey], thinking a little, asked the religious man if Spaniards went to heaven. The religious man answered yes… The chief then said without further thought that he did not want to go there but to hell so as not to be where they were and where he would not see such cruel people. This is the name and honour that God and our faith have earned.

  • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    The only reason Columbus discovered the Americas was because he used bad calculations. Everyone else knew that India was too far away for circumnavigation. He was lucky that there was an undiscovered continent on the way.