I will never understand women moaning about pockets. They had pockets. They had big huge massive pockets that were hidden away inside great big swinging wide legged pantaloons. But women didnt like them, cos they werent skin tight. So they fell out of fashion. You can still get them, but people dont. Cos they want things that cover them like a small condom on a magnum dong.
Christ, some jeans are even doing away with the buttons and the zipper, cos it takes away from the tightness. You all did this to yourselves. You chose looking “sexy” over comfort.
We gotta respect the struggle: my man is out here doing a sociological analysis of the history of women’s fashion even though his brain is capable than no more than a Petri dish worth of depth. Was it a good analysis? No, but he tried and he had courage, never let your limitations shape your destiny.
But maybe do try to research things before speaking.
Ah, the classic personal attack instead of attacking the argument. Social media is such a wonder. Just an endless gaggle of cave brained cunts that have never felt the velvety softness of the back hand when being a prick.
Yeah, not like they cant just not buy the pocketless skin tight shit… right? I mean, those trousers, with the big pockets are still there in the shops. But the bulk of sales is still going to camel toe showing jeans and leggings. So, yeah. THEY, fucking chose. No matter what the rabble of social media simps and pick me girls wants to say.
Yes, have you? And are you still pretending that the demand doesnt drive the supply???
As I already posted, https://www.next.us/en/shop/womens/clothing/trousers/f/style-wideleg?p=1#438 Big pockets in just about all of these. So, lets stop with the lie that woman cant have big pockets. Its a problem of your own making. Because women would rather “look sexy” than be comfortable or have pockets. Vanity drives the small/no pocket market. Nothing else.
And how many clothes with deep pockets have you seen? Because I have seen exactly fucking zero. Also, you sound like someone who never spoke to a woman, because anyone in their right mind will rather feel comfortable. Add to this another thing: go google women’s clothes designers.
I gave you a link. And for some reason, you gave me a link back with all the shit that women flock to buy.
I dont really get what youre doing here, other being terrified of being wrong. Women buy jeans/trousers with small/no pockets because they want to “look sexy”. The trousers are there. The jeans are there. But no one is buying, and the demand drives the market.
Do you get it now, or do I need to break out the special crayons?
You gave me a link, I gave you a link. You have a problem?
Lol, I get what you are doing here, though: proclaim that things are the way you state they are and that’s it. Well, you can fuck right off here with this kind of thinking
jesus fucking christ, how dumb are you? You really dont understand supply and demand? What drives a market? The big pockets are out there, but few people are buying them. Thats because women, the buyers, only want to the slim fit/skin tight shit. Women are the ones driving the market, you spoon eating cunt.
Except that men’s pants don’t fit at all. Women have curves and men are more… Straight? Plus the crotch area is weird and will rub weirdly if you use men’s pants.
I will never understand women moaning about pockets. They had pockets. They had big huge massive pockets that were hidden away inside great big swinging wide legged pantaloons. But women didnt like them, cos they werent skin tight. So they fell out of fashion. You can still get them, but people dont. Cos they want things that cover them like a small condom on a magnum dong.
Christ, some jeans are even doing away with the buttons and the zipper, cos it takes away from the tightness. You all did this to yourselves. You chose looking “sexy” over comfort.
We gotta respect the struggle: my man is out here doing a sociological analysis of the history of women’s fashion even though his brain is capable than no more than a Petri dish worth of depth. Was it a good analysis? No, but he tried and he had courage, never let your limitations shape your destiny.
But maybe do try to research things before speaking.
Ah, the classic personal attack instead of attacking the argument. Social media is such a wonder. Just an endless gaggle of cave brained cunts that have never felt the velvety softness of the back hand when being a prick.
You know I retract part of my earlier comment, sometimes it might be better to let your limitations actually limit what you write in replies
Dont you hate it when you try to sound like an intellectual, but you just end up coming across as someone so fucking dumb that they bite spoons?
That’s where you’re wrong, buddy, I don’t use spoons
Too difficult for you to figure out?
They’re too rotund
Lol. They chose, right. Uh, mean women
/sarcasm, of course
Yeah, not like they cant just not buy the pocketless skin tight shit… right? I mean, those trousers, with the big pockets are still there in the shops. But the bulk of sales is still going to camel toe showing jeans and leggings. So, yeah. THEY, fucking chose. No matter what the rabble of social media simps and pick me girls wants to say.
Lol. You ever saw women’s part of clothes shops?
Yes, have you? And are you still pretending that the demand doesnt drive the supply???
As I already posted, https://www.next.us/en/shop/womens/clothing/trousers/f/style-wideleg?p=1#438 Big pockets in just about all of these. So, lets stop with the lie that woman cant have big pockets. Its a problem of your own making. Because women would rather “look sexy” than be comfortable or have pockets. Vanity drives the small/no pocket market. Nothing else.
And how many clothes with deep pockets have you seen? Because I have seen exactly fucking zero. Also, you sound like someone who never spoke to a woman, because anyone in their right mind will rather feel comfortable. Add to this another thing: go google women’s clothes designers.
I gave you a link. And for some reason, you gave me a link back with all the shit that women flock to buy.
I dont really get what youre doing here, other being terrified of being wrong. Women buy jeans/trousers with small/no pockets because they want to “look sexy”. The trousers are there. The jeans are there. But no one is buying, and the demand drives the market.
Do you get it now, or do I need to break out the special crayons?
You gave me a link, I gave you a link. You have a problem?
Lol, I get what you are doing here, though: proclaim that things are the way you state they are and that’s it. Well, you can fuck right off here with this kind of thinking
jesus fucking christ, how dumb are you? You really dont understand supply and demand? What drives a market? The big pockets are out there, but few people are buying them. Thats because women, the buyers, only want to the slim fit/skin tight shit. Women are the ones driving the market, you spoon eating cunt.
Go ahead, https://www.next.us/en/shop/womens/clothing/jeans?p=1#340.26666259765625
All pockets are normal, surely? What a joke
You mean the pants in the mens section?
Well if it fits… Why not? I haven’t seen those pantaloons anywhere nearby
Except that men’s pants don’t fit at all. Women have curves and men are more… Straight? Plus the crotch area is weird and will rub weirdly if you use men’s pants.
I buy big baggy unisex stuff with gloriously roomy pockets. I’ve always hated skin tight clothing. Fuck fashion, I want comfort and utility.
Removed by mod