• Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, not like they cant just not buy the pocketless skin tight shit… right? I mean, those trousers, with the big pockets are still there in the shops. But the bulk of sales is still going to camel toe showing jeans and leggings. So, yeah. THEY, fucking chose. No matter what the rabble of social media simps and pick me girls wants to say.

        • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, have you? And are you still pretending that the demand doesnt drive the supply???

          As I already posted, https://www.next.us/en/shop/womens/clothing/trousers/f/style-wideleg?p=1#438 Big pockets in just about all of these. So, lets stop with the lie that woman cant have big pockets. Its a problem of your own making. Because women would rather “look sexy” than be comfortable or have pockets. Vanity drives the small/no pocket market. Nothing else.

          • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            And how many clothes with deep pockets have you seen? Because I have seen exactly fucking zero. Also, you sound like someone who never spoke to a woman, because anyone in their right mind will rather feel comfortable. Add to this another thing: go google women’s clothes designers.

            • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I gave you a link. And for some reason, you gave me a link back with all the shit that women flock to buy.

              I dont really get what youre doing here, other being terrified of being wrong. Women buy jeans/trousers with small/no pockets because they want to “look sexy”. The trousers are there. The jeans are there. But no one is buying, and the demand drives the market.

              Do you get it now, or do I need to break out the special crayons?

              • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                You gave me a link, I gave you a link. You have a problem?

                Lol, I get what you are doing here, though: proclaim that things are the way you state they are and that’s it. Well, you can fuck right off here with this kind of thinking

        • Mr. Satan@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well if it fits… Why not? I haven’t seen those pantaloons anywhere nearby

          • SybilVane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Except that men’s pants don’t fit at all. Women have curves and men are more… Straight? Plus the crotch area is weird and will rub weirdly if you use men’s pants.

          • disgrunty@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I buy big baggy unisex stuff with gloriously roomy pockets. I’ve always hated skin tight clothing. Fuck fashion, I want comfort and utility.