• LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      She’s completely Caucasian. If we consider Italians Caucasian. Yes we do consider Italians Caucasian.

      She’s also a method actress who’s been known to assume several different nationalities, each for a long duration of time. Like remember when she looked & spoke black for awhile?

      • GandalftheBlack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The only way she’s Caucasian is if you’re using it to mean “white”, which is based in pseudoscientific racial theory. Quoting the second definition from Wiktionary:

        • (anthropology, dated) Of a racial classification pertaining to people having certain phenotypical features such as straight, curly, or wavy hair and very light to brown pigmented skin, and originating from Europe, parts of Northern Africa and Central, South, and Western Asia.
        • Synonyms: Caucasoid, Europid

        I don’t tend to do linguistic prescriptivism, but I have to make an exception for things like this. Caucasian should just be used to refer to people from the Caucasus.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        If we consider Italians Caucasian. Yes we do consider Italians Caucasian.

        For now. That’ll change.

      • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, we just have a ton of really similar words for not-quite the same thing.

        Latin: with roots going back to Rome (Most Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Romanian people). But almost nobody uses this in the USA.

        Latin American/Latino/Latina: with roots in South/Central America, the Caribbean, or Mexico (notably, this includes Brazil and Haiti)

        Hispanic: with roots in Spanish-speaking countries (notably, this excludes Brazil and Haiti, and includes Spain)

        Ariana Grande could reasonably be called Latin, but not Latina. She just tans well so she plays the “racially ambiguous” card when it suits her.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s all ridiculous. You guys (the US) need to get past this race shit. She’s a US citizen by birth and that’s that.

          For some reason none of you want to be just “Americans”. You want to divide yourselves up into little tribes that link you back to some place you’ve never been.

          If you yourself emigrated, sure…call yourself Italian-American. If it was your parents…you are American and your parents were Italian. If it was your grandparents, you’re just American. Stop pretending.

          It would also help your politics no end.

          • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            get past this race shit

            You want people that are systemically disadvantaged (e.g. over policed, redlined, underrepresented, etc.) to just get over it? All colorblindness does is let people ignore that. Please find a solution with a little more room for reality, history, empathy, and complexity. Thanks.

            • ultranaut@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Get past and get over seem like distinctly different things. Get past suggests moving through and beyond to me.

                • ultranaut@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  I don’t think I am really qualified to answer that adequately. The simple answer is people need to stop being racist and start being anti-racist, but that’s a multi-generational project to transform culture and not something that can really be imposed via political will alone. The obvious answer is replace the system, but again there’s the issue of this being the real world so the path to a new system is very messy and potentially involves another civil war given how re-entrenched the forces of racism have become. I’d like to think systemic reform is still possible but realistically Trumpism must be resolved first before reform could ever happen, and there’s a lot of serious issues arising from wealth concentration that potentially have to be dealt with too (i.e. even without Trumpism, we still have a bunch of ultrawealthy racists wielding their money to manipulate society).

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re being ridiculous. Humans will never stop dividing ourselves into tribes. And guess what? Prejudice doesn’t have to be a part of that division.

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              uhhh, race as we know it wasn’t really a thing until well after the romans, before then skin colour was about as interesting as hair and eye colour.

              afaik people cared somewhat about ethnicity specifically, but racism as we know it wasn’t a thing at all.