Modlog: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog/25693?page=1&actionType=All&userId=21053985 , banned by @[email protected]

For context, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, and got into a few arguments.

More context:

It started (to my knowledge) with this comment, goat pinged db0 after he downvoted a comment

a note on the uyghurs (click to show

For the record, I believe that the Uyghurs are mistreated by the CCP, and are experiencing cultural erasure and Human Rights abuses, but there’s a lack of evidence that it’s a genocide specifically (especially since it seems to target the religion, rather than the ethnic group).

Goat banned IndustryStandard, leading to this thread: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/ leading to goat commenting this:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/21070262

He mentions this:

We constantly encounter bots, spammers, alt accounts, trolls, and doxxers, so I need to be vigilant by regularly checking who’s interfering and from where.

Which I find ironic, since there was some vote manipulation happening, which goat did nothing about (and could be behind), but I’ll get to that later.

After some more arguments, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, saying that letting tankie users engage on dbzer0 comms means other users are tankies:


source

He said that it’s different for LW (lemmy.world) and SJW (sh.itjust.works, not the other word). He then poster the “Tank Man” picture to [email protected], as he expected us to retaliate (being tankies, according to him). We did not, in fact, retaliate: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21089819

He also posted this in tankiejerk: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52268655, https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20733015.

He also may have done vote manipulation, and at the very least allowed it.
Take, for example, this comment: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21091723
Per lemvotes, it was downvoted by the following users:

The relevant ones here are:

They have all downvoted exclusively arguments against goat and others, and were made almost at the same time.

After a bit more arguing (I’m not posting the specific comments because it’s tedious, and they’re easy to see by scrolling through goat’s profile.) goat decided to ban all dbzer0 users from meanwhileongrad, I think this comment marks when he decided to do this, but I may be wrong.

note on the post that comment was in reply to

I think this reply (by unruffled) was taken out of context. Unruffled is absolutely not defending what’s happening to the Uyghurs, they’re saying that a lot of people have a double standard, where they will not hesitate to condemn the Uyghur genocide, but hesitate on the gaza one, especially when the gaza one is more severe and urgent. To quote them directly:

Yes, that’s exactly what I was saying but of course they misrepresented it. You know exactly what Americans are like. They couldn’t give a shit about the uyghurs, except as a way to China bash and feel superior. I also explicitly said later in the comments I agreed it was a genocide. They’re just doin’ the usual bad faith takes.

Feel free to quote me lol

Since this goat had been banned from dbzer0 for being hostile: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=63615

    • miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      181·
      3 days ago

      Since db0 is math, and math, by definition and practice is both truth and fact, then we have MoL denying fact, as to be expected.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        376·
        3 days ago

        The term is deeply tied to both eugenics and fascism, Nazis would label modernist art, queer people, Jews, disabled people, and leftists as “degenerate”. There really isn’t a reading that’s not describing people as subhuman.

        Using it assumes there’s a “pure” social body and that some people are contaminants. It’s a pretty clear indication that the user is operating from a worldview fundamentally at odds with anyone that values solidarity and liberation.

        “degenerates” as a pejorative is almost exclusively used in crypto-fascist and red-brown spaces.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          16·
          3 days ago

          oh dear I’ve been using it as a synonym for scumbag since i was born while railing against using “brainrot” as an insult

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            183·
            3 days ago

            It’s quite literally a fascists favorite insult, half their deal is railing against “degenerated culture” because kids have iPads instead of 7-6 jobs or reconquering Rome or whatever

        • socsa@piefed.socialEnglish
          6·
          2 days ago

          Oh God and I’ve been using it to talk about people who can’t watch a sports game without being in 4 different gambling apps…

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          1213·
          3 days ago

          “degenerates” as a pejorative is almost exclusively used in crypto-fascist and red-brown spaces.

          Completely ridiculous. A word doesn’t belong to alt-right losers just because it becomes popular on 4chan for a bit. I’ve used “degenerate” and heard it used many times. No need to fence off our language, just so you can have a shallow easy make believe reason to ascribe someone to a hate group.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              814·
              3 days ago

              All I’m saying is treating the word as a dog whistle is dumb. It not a code word for “undesirables” or wtv fucked up shit the nazis and 4chan are using it for. Normal people use it with the new agreed upon definition.

              Part of me also thinks it’s caving into 4chan and the like. It’s encouraging their definition even though it hasn’t been valid for a few decades already. They don’t get to define the word and I won’t stop using it because of them essentially.

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                71·
                2 days ago

                Normal people use it with the new agreed upon definition.

                It’s “normal” in the sense that fascist ideology and terminology are normal in a fascist society.

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlEnglish
                  53·
                  2 days ago

                  Simple as.

                  Like I’m going to give grown-ass adults on a pseudonymous social media platform the benefit of the doubt ten years after Gamergate.

              • davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlEnglish
                115·
                3 days ago

                Normal people use it using the new agreed upon definition.

                That’s the old, pre-fascist, pre-eugenicist definition, not a new one, and no, we don’t use it, because we haven’t been living under a rock for the last ninety years. We know what a dog whistle is.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  77·
                  3 days ago

                  Languages evolve I guess. I know blink 182 had a song named “degenerate”. If I enter the word in chosic, I get 7000 hits (songs with the word in the lyrics). I find the expression “degenerate gambler” is kind of common? Idk.

                  Just trying to show that the word is common and lost it’s ties to nazis and fascists a long time ago. Just a regular but harsh insult imo, but wtv.

                  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlEnglish
                    114·
                    2 days ago

                    https://www.dangerousspeech.org/libraries/dangerous-metaphors-how-dehumanizing-rhetoric-works

                    One speaker said: “And, at some point, we will have enough power that we will clear them from the streets forever, that which is degenerate in white countries will be removed.” This racist statement implied that the people in question represent a hygienic threat to the society that should be eliminated. The existence of these humans was reduced by the speaker to “degeneration”. This biological term refers to unstoppable deterioration that can be prevented only by the eradication of the subject.

                    The reason we’re so hard-ass about dehumanizing terms and other dog whistles on Lemmy is because we know how online fora become Nazi bars like 4chan. We remember and learned from GamerGate. The whole BreadTube phenomenon was formed around countering “alt-right” influencers in online spaces.

                  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                    96·
                    3 days ago

                    Hey, dipshit: you’re wrong and the slightest bit of research would have shown that, get the fuck over it and stop using the language of bigots. Gonna cry about “welfare queens” getting called racism next or what?

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            1411·
            3 days ago

            I’ve used “degenerate” and heard it used many times.

            self report

            If you’re referring to other people as subhuman people are going to come to conclusions about your worldview.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              1412·
              3 days ago

              Sorry but you are just out of touch. Its a normal word used by the population at large. Thinking using the word “degenerate” means being a crypto fascist is top tier silly.

              Try as hard as you might to lump me in with them because of the use of a common word (lol), I will never be any kind of fascist.

              I actually think the short form “degen” is popular amongst the younger generations.

              In any caze, it’s asinine behavior. It’s weak. You’re basically just looking for the easiest way to write someone off, like above. Instead of actually thinking about what I was saying, you just gave a trite remark. You protect yourself by turning everyone you disagree with into another fascist that can’t possibly have a point.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                148·
                3 days ago

                If you’re referring to other people as subhuman then people are going to come to conclusions about your worldview.

                You protect yourself by turning everyone you disagree with into a fascist that can’t possibly have a point.

                The post here is about the goat (and associated clowns) that specialize in turning everyone they disagree with into a ‘tankie’ that can’t possibly have a point.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  119·
                  3 days ago

                  Actual definition of degenerate when referring to a person:

                  “an immoral or corrupt person.”

                  The post here is about the goat (and associated clowns) that specialize in turning everyone they disagree with into a ‘tankie’ that can’t possibly have a point.

                  Yes, the behavior is dumb in both cases. I’d argue what you are doing is worse since your decision hinges on non sensical surface analysis of the persons vocabulary.

                  I’ve also been called a tankie and I hate the liberal use of the word. It kind of shows just how off base your assumptions are.

                  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                    127·
                    3 days ago

                    Actual definition of degenerate when referring to a person: an immoral or corrupt person.

                    It’s fascinating that you accuse me of a surface analysis and yet the point isn’t the surface meaning of the word, but the subtext.

                    When I get called a ‘degenerate tankie roach’ on meanwhileongrad I absolutely read dehumanization in the subtext. But maybe that’s just my depraved lack of morals at work again.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            33·
            2 days ago

            A word doesn’t belong to alt-right losers just because it becomes popular on 4chan for a bit.

            Pretty sure 4chan is the capital of alt-right losers.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            22·
            2 days ago

            well even the new definition/common usage includes implications of degeneration, whose meaning we would all know even without learning about Hitler