Modlog: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog/25693?page=1&actionType=All&userId=21053985 , banned by @[email protected]

For context, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, and got into a few arguments.

More context:

It started (to my knowledge) with this comment, goat pinged db0 after he downvoted a comment

a note on the uyghurs (click to show

For the record, I believe that the Uyghurs are mistreated by the CCP, and are experiencing cultural erasure and Human Rights abuses, but there’s a lack of evidence that it’s a genocide specifically (especially since it seems to target the religion, rather than the ethnic group).

Goat banned IndustryStandard, leading to this thread: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/ leading to goat commenting this:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/21070262

He mentions this:

We constantly encounter bots, spammers, alt accounts, trolls, and doxxers, so I need to be vigilant by regularly checking who’s interfering and from where.

Which I find ironic, since there was some vote manipulation happening, which goat did nothing about (and could be behind), but I’ll get to that later.

After some more arguments, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, saying that letting tankie users engage on dbzer0 comms means other users are tankies:


source

He said that it’s different for LW (lemmy.world) and SJW (sh.itjust.works, not the other word). He then poster the “Tank Man” picture to [email protected], as he expected us to retaliate (being tankies, according to him). We did not, in fact, retaliate: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21089819

He also posted this in tankiejerk: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52268655, https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20733015.

He also may have done vote manipulation, and at the very least allowed it.
Take, for example, this comment: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21091723
Per lemvotes, it was downvoted by the following users:

The relevant ones here are:

They have all downvoted exclusively arguments against goat and others, and were made almost at the same time.

After a bit more arguing (I’m not posting the specific comments because it’s tedious, and they’re easy to see by scrolling through goat’s profile.) goat decided to ban all dbzer0 users from meanwhileongrad, I think this comment marks when he decided to do this, but I may be wrong.

note on the post that comment was in reply to

I think this reply (by unruffled) was taken out of context. Unruffled is absolutely not defending what’s happening to the Uyghurs, they’re saying that a lot of people have a double standard, where they will not hesitate to condemn the Uyghur genocide, but hesitate on the gaza one, especially when the gaza one is more severe and urgent. To quote them directly:

Yes, that’s exactly what I was saying but of course they misrepresented it. You know exactly what Americans are like. They couldn’t give a shit about the uyghurs, except as a way to China bash and feel superior. I also explicitly said later in the comments I agreed it was a genocide. They’re just doin’ the usual bad faith takes.

Feel free to quote me lol

Since this goat had been banned from dbzer0 for being hostile: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=63615

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      All I’m saying is treating the word as a dog whistle is dumb. It not a code word for “undesirables” or wtv fucked up shit the nazis and 4chan are using it for. Normal people use it with the new agreed upon definition.

      Part of me also thinks it’s caving into 4chan and the like. It’s encouraging their definition even though it hasn’t been valid for a few decades already. They don’t get to define the word and I won’t stop using it because of them essentially.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Normal people use it with the new agreed upon definition.

        It’s “normal” in the sense that fascist ideology and terminology are normal in a fascist society.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Except it’s literally not the fucking dictionary definition.

          Per oxford:

          noun noun: degenerate; plural noun: degenerates /dəˈjen(ə)rət/

          an immoral or corrupt person.
          "get out of my house, you degenerate!"
          
            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              So the definition in the link you gave does not mention the word undesirable or reference groups of people who the nazis considered undesirable.

              Edit: well the Merriam definition is a bit closer to the term, as in its more dehumanizing and harsher. I don’t really think it’s enough to be equivalent. I also think who you target with the word is really what makes you a nazi, and not just using it.

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Dictionary definitions are almost completely useless for historical/social analysis. It’s much more accurate to examine etymology and historical usage. The history of this term is very very very clearly fascist especially in USA. The people who commonly use this term are fash-adjacent at best even if they don’t realize it.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  That’s a fair point to make but this user is simply lying about what the definition actually is.

              • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                No, it’s about ethics in gaming journalism!

                GTFO, sealion. If you’re still defending this hours later, you’re trolling.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  People are still responding to me. So yes, I will reply. I dont understand the reference to gaming journalism?

                  Can’t I also say the same thing about you. Why are you responding hours later, are you trolling right now?

                  And although you might have a point with not wanting to have dehumanizing language in the community, it doesn’t mean he isn’t wrong with his dictionary definition.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Simple as.

          Like I’m going to give grown-ass adults on a pseudonymous social media platform the benefit of the doubt ten years after Gamergate.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Normal people use it using the new agreed upon definition.

        That’s the old, pre-fascist, pre-eugenicist definition, not a new one, and no, we don’t use it, because we haven’t been living under a rock for the last ninety years. We know what a dog whistle is.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Languages evolve I guess. I know blink 182 had a song named “degenerate”. If I enter the word in chosic, I get 7000 hits (songs with the word in the lyrics). I find the expression “degenerate gambler” is kind of common? Idk.

          Just trying to show that the word is common and lost it’s ties to nazis and fascists a long time ago. Just a regular but harsh insult imo, but wtv.

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            https://www.dangerousspeech.org/libraries/dangerous-metaphors-how-dehumanizing-rhetoric-works

            One speaker said: “And, at some point, we will have enough power that we will clear them from the streets forever, that which is degenerate in white countries will be removed.” This racist statement implied that the people in question represent a hygienic threat to the society that should be eliminated. The existence of these humans was reduced by the speaker to “degeneration”. This biological term refers to unstoppable deterioration that can be prevented only by the eradication of the subject.

            The reason we’re so hard-ass about dehumanizing terms and other dog whistles on Lemmy is because we know how online fora become Nazi bars like 4chan. We remember and learned from GamerGate. The whole BreadTube phenomenon was formed around countering “alt-right” influencers in online spaces.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Hey, dipshit: you’re wrong and the slightest bit of research would have shown that, get the fuck over it and stop using the language of bigots. Gonna cry about “welfare queens” getting called racism next or what?