• KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah it’s not supported for my system so I can’t even launch it. But I was watching some friends stream it and it crashed for three out of four of them within two games. I don’t think any of us will be getting it after release.

    • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      It can help prevent various methods commonly used, but nothing can stop cheating. All you can do is minimise it.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There’s lots they could do to minimise cheaters that they’re not doing. The main one being not sending the cheaters information in the first place.

        The wall hack cheat works because for some bizarre reason the server sends players information about the position of other players they can’t possibly see, players on the other side of the map for example, there’s no reason for the client to have that information. The cheaters cannot access information that isn’t given to them.

        • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I agree that only sending absolute needed data is a great policy for stopping all sorts of cheating. I could see them skipping this step if they don’t have a way of doing it fast enough that won’t cause other issues like player pop in. That’s what it’s have to assume.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Let people run their own servers, allow blacklists and whitelists. Enable instant replay and let mods van cheaters.

        Problem fucking solved.

      • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Counterpoint: you could not have TPM and secure boot requirements that needlessly alienates a large player base of Linux users.

        • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s true. My machine doesn’t have a TPM. I understand they are trying to make things easier for their team, but I agree I’d rather have wider support.

        • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Counter-counterpoint: Linux users are no users if a game is brimming with cheaters. Who the fuck plays a competitive multiplayer game full of cheaters only because it runs on Linux?

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                If we had private dedicated servers and the ability to play without anti-cheat, Linux support would be a non-issue. But because we don’t have that, anti-cheat is seen as a necessity, and we don’t have Linux support.