The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They are accusing you of not reading the article OP posted, or even the two sentence summary OP included in their post body.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Oh well I did. Sounds like you guys didn’t really apply any critical thinking to what you read though.

      Pam Bondi: “Trust me bro”

      Me: “Lmao no”

      You: “RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE”

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have absolutely no clue how you have concluded from anything I’ve said in this thread (or anywhere, frankly) that I trust anything Bondi says.

      • tane69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Dude lol. You cannot be this stupid

        Lmfao this freak got so mad he downvoted every comment I’ve ever made. Psychotic