- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute
Every commenter before me only read the headline and misunderstood it.
You should try reading at least the post’s body, but maybe branch out and read the article as well.
That their copy isn’t missing time but the “unedited” released copy is? I dont see how that’s any better. Why just cut a (few) minute(s) out if they aren’t trying to hide something?
It isn’t better, just stupider!
I didn’t say anything was better than any other thing. I only remarked that people were commenting on a misunderstanding of the headline alone, clearly not even having read the body. Their comments make no sense otherwise.
Thought the same thing. And so many upvotes, too
Well yea. Just cuz pam bondi says “there’s always a missing minute” doesn’t refute that the video footage they uploaded was spliced together by 2 separate clips.
https://www.wired.com/story/the-fbis-jeffrey-epstein-prison-video-had-nearly-3-minutes-cut-out/