• Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Last I remember, the Baltic states have better internet than most of Europe and the US.

        • Nihilistra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yo, german bro here. When I go by train from my village Willich to fucking Düsseldorf I lose connection 2 times, going 10 kilometers into the state capital.

          My friend in Wesel can’t reliably call his clients by car cause it’s just a connectivity minefield around there.

          Send help

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Germany is so far behind with wifi coverage, it’s insane. Fiber is also rare outside of the hotspots. I volunteered in a refugee center once and an ongoing joke among them was how war-torn Syria had better internet connection than Germany lol

              • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Old farts in charge don’t care about it. Merkel has promised full net coverage a couple times but oh well. It’s definitely better than it was before, but there are still lots of areas where there is work to be done. As our saying goes: Deutschlands Mühlen mahlen langsam. (Germany’s mills grind slowly)

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Almost like news written in english tends to focus on english-speaking countries and their allies

    • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The obvious context of this meme is articles that express the “consensus opinion of the international community” on some foreign issue. Like “international community condemns antisemetic criticism of Israel.” Or “international community condemns Niger coup, calls for original government to be reinstated so France can keep buying cheap Uranium from the second poorest country on the planet.”

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah fuck my local news station for covering local news. It should only be coverage about places that I will never go to, issues I have no control over, and be an exercise in guilt and self-righteous masturbation for the people running it.

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    South Korea is pretty good about pumping out culturally relevant stuff too. Honestly I’d say they do it better than Japan these days (not that I’m personally interested in stuff like k-pop, but it’s clearly huge)

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Korea is certainly ascendant but I doubt they’ve passed Japan in cultural exports. At least in the US, there is anime and Sushi in basically every population center these days, whereas Korean BBQ and chicken are still mostly popular in large urban areas (where sushi is still way more popular).

    • Ad4mWayn3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genuine question: How exactly are they more culturally relevant than Japan besides K-pop and maybe Korean novels? When it comes to matters besides entertainment, I guess I’m a little clueless.

      • Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not the OP, but I think that’s exactly what they’re talking about, entertainment. I don’t know if Korea has overtaken Japan in that sphere, but it’s certainly significant. I’d also point out that Korea’s COVID response was so organized that there was a period of time that it was being looked to and mentioned in the media which is culturally relevant (kinda like pointing out the Finnish education system or the German reputation for engineering).

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Basically democracies. It is kind of difficult to consider non-democratic dictators like Putin or Kim Jong-un as representatives of some kind of “community”.

      • Furball@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        South America just isn’t really too involved in international politics in general, the whole region is neutral in almost all conflicts since very few directly affect them

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you use the old Cold War definition, yes. Otherwise

                However, as the Cold War ended with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the definition largely shifted to instead refer to any country that boasts a well-functioning democratic system with little prospects of political risk, in addition to a strong rule of law, a capitalist economy with economic stability, and a high standard of living.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I said this about Assad as well, but when someone is a forever ruler, it may not be as democratic as the name implies

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course. I am not going to defend the particular choice of countries in that picture. Where is South Korea, for example? However. Democracy is greater than just democratic election. Fascists in Germany also come to power in a free democratic election, does not make Nazi Germany a democratic country.

        • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The nazis in Germany came to power in the “Machtergreifung” (seizure of power).
          In the last free democratic election, they got 33% of the vote.

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, but it was by far the largest (the second party got just 20%) and in multiparty system that was enough to later enact laws that made it into dictatorship.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        South Korea at least should probably be included in this map. It generally does include capitalist democracies, but it’s not sufficient and probably not necessary for the general criteria.

      • GenEcon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never heard that they don’t generally stand alongside the rest of democracies if you hear ‘international community’. All of them condemning Russias attack on Ukraine, China taking parts of the Philippines and the terrorist attack on Israel from the Hamas.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        to be fair, South Korea is a company country, fucking Samsung is more influential than the government is many places

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes Brazil, beacon of freedom, like the freedom to shoot some slum kid in the face for the crime of being a slum rat.

        Brazil makes the USA seem like the fucking beacon of freedom and equality that the fucking G.I. Joe cartoons portray it as.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            dumb? have you ever fucking been to Brazil? well at least outside the posh tourist areas.

            I already know the answer is no, because anyone who HAS knows that the shit I described is all too common, and it’s not like I haven’t lived in “economically challenged”(see Hood) parts of the US.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What an odd coincidence that primarily white, English-speaking countries have democracy.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing odd about it. There are historical reasons for that. But English speaking? You do know that there are many countries in EU?

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Even as primarily, this is false statement. And even there, there are historical reasons.

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are so stuck on details you entirely missed my point. Are you just going to ignore the fact that the “world” depicted here is literally just Europe and its most successful colonies?

              Yeah colonialism is a “historical reason”, but wtf are you even saying there? Being killed is “a reason” to be lying on the stairs, but explaining that by saying “he has his reasons” is so out-of-touch as to be insane.

    • avrachan@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah,

      these are the democracies that invaded Iraq/Libya to install a democracy.

      I keep having to remind myself how much good it did to the people of Iraq/Libya.

    • BabyWah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re only dictators in our minds, because the West has told us they are for years. I’ve always wondered what’s really behind their strategy, but we can’t get unbiased news about their countries and the people living there anymore.

      It’s really interesting to me because they are dictators, they’re also the only countries that managed to give the big finger to the US’ meddling and disrupting regional politics. Did they become dictators to stop that or is it a chicken and the egg situation? Need more info.

        • BabyWah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes I’m not sure, only in the sense that I’ve seen what happens when you kill a dictator and try to replace it with ‘democracy.’

          Everyone swoops in, hires some armed forces to get the natural resources they need and then leaves. The population is left to fend themselves and are usually governed for decades by the stronger mostly extremist government party. By the time they revolt, they get beat down again and again, until they just give up and the country descends into another humanitarian crisis.

          It just sets them back for decades. That’s all.

        • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Current Africa is the fault of British and French. Current Middle East the fault of British, French and the USA. Current India has strong feelings against the British. Current Iran has a strong theocracy because of the USA. Current South America still feels the effects of the USA’s CIA’s meddling.

          Of course it is your oil-and-war-industry-mirror governments. It has been an entity whose sole focus has been war profiteering and thus warmongering at least since the WW2, no matter how democratically(!) you choose your presidents. Your warmongering government doesn’t even care about its citizens (see healthcare, gun laws, abortion laws, lgbt laws, online and other privacy rights, etc.). Your whole nationwide and even international media is a public opinion shaping and damage control asset for the government.

          What the fuck do you expect to hear from other people, who have been direct or indirect victims of your warmongering and coups, to say about this? Tell you that is is so known a fact that we can practically ignore it at this point and carry on with our lives? Problem is, unless you stop, we can’t even carry on with our lives.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idk, I feel like Al Jazeera gets quite a bit of visibility and has a good amount of credibility, but Qatar isn’t on this map.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is, so you definitely want to keep that in mind when consuming their content. On the flipside, they have access to sources in the Middle East that your big mainstream western media organizations can only dream about, so you don’t want to ignore them entirely either. There are ways to be smart about it.

    • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      America is a dictatorship of money disguised as a democracy, and the others are vassal states in lockstep with American foreign policy. Most of them have colonized and exploited the rest of the world for centuries and they’re still doing it now, to the tune of over $10 trillion a year in net extraction from the global south.

      https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B

      Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.

      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802200005X

      Our results show that in 2015 the North net appropriated from the South 12 billion tons of embodied raw material equivalents, 822 million hectares of embodied land, 21 exajoules of embodied energy, and 188 million person-years of embodied labour, worth $10.8 trillion in Northern prices – enough to end extreme poverty 70 times over. Over the whole period, drain from the South totalled $242 trillion (constant 2010 USD). This drain represents a significant windfall for the global North, equivalent to a quarter of Northern GDP. For comparison, we also report drain in global average prices. Using this method, we find that the South’s losses due to unequal exchange outstrip their total aid receipts over the period by a factor of 30. Our analysis confirms that unequal exchange is a significant driver of global inequality, uneven development, and ecological breakdown.

    • avrachan@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah,

      these are the democracies that invaded Iraq/Libya to install a democracy.

      I keep having to remind myself how much good it did to the people of Iraq/Libya.

      • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        and we all remember what a paradise those countries were. man, that time gadaffis son killed a waiter because he spilled soup. you miss him?

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Iraq is absolutely a functioning democracy and not a dictatorship right now.

        Libya would be if it actually got invaded, which 100% should have happened. UN forces not taking control of the situation is a huge stain on the UN.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The UN working in Libya as peacekeeping forces would’ve prevented the monstrous situation we’re in now, at bare minimum. If you don’t believe that, you quite simply are not recognizing past UN peacekeeping successes.

            I have never supported the Iraq War but to deny Iraq is currently a functional, if very deeply flawed, democracy is, in my view, to devalue the Iraqi citizens and the fledgling democracy they have.

            • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The UN working in Libya as peacekeeping forces would’ve prevented the monstrous situation we’re in now

              Because it’s that easy to counter Islamic extremism in a power vacuum. ISIS was active and gaining power in 2011, including in Libya.

              to deny Iraq is currently a functional, if very deeply flawed, democracy is, in my view, to devalue the Iraqi citizens and the fledgling democracy they have.

              The state of Iraq’s corrupt democracy as of 2023 is little better than under Saddam

              https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/4/16/the-long-shadow-of-saddams-dictatorship-in-iraq

              And all it cost was over a million Iraqi civilian deaths, millions of refugees, and the birth of ISIS in 2007.

              The 2015 British Parliament inquiry found that the Islamic extremists fighting Qaddafi would not have succeeded without western air power, weapons, intelligence, and personnel, meaning the best way to prevent the humanitarian crisis in Libya would have been to fucking leave Libya alone in the first place. The inquiry also found that the intervention was economically motivated rather than humanitarian.

              https://www.salon.com/2016/09/16/u-k-parliament-report-details-how-natos-2011-war-in-libya-was-based-on-lies/

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Because it’s that easy to counter Islamic extremism in a power vacuum

                Hey look I found the exact issue the UN peacekeepers address in these exact situations

                The 2015 British Parliament inquiry found that the Islamic extremists fighting Qaddafi would not have succeeded without western air power, weapons, intelligence, and personnel, meaning the best way to prevent the humanitarian crisis in Libya would have been to fucking leave Libya alone in the first place.

                Just let Gaddafi murder people who want democracy with superior air power guys. It’s simple.

                • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  hey look I found the exact issue the UN peacekeepers address in these exact situations

                  Yeah? And how the fuck did that strategy work out anywhere else in the middle east?

                  people who want democracy

                  The coalition air mission was to support Islamic extremists in battles against the Libyan government. Those rebels wanted an Islamic state in Libya, not a democracy. They were also committing racist pogroms and atrocities against black Libyans, and western operatives on the ground were aware of it the entire time.

                  Read the fucking article. Here it is again:

                  https://www.salon.com/2016/09/16/u-k-parliament-report-details-how-natos-2011-war-in-libya-was-based-on-lies/

                  Read every word of it before you respond to me.

        • crackajack@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not sure where you have been in the past years but ISIS and Islamists in Libya.

          The Middle East is a curious place. Regime change doesn’t work if the population are too fractured for nation building, which Middle Eastern countries has plenty of. It is tragic to argue that living under authoritarians that provide stability is better than living free but without law and order.

          I’m an advocate for democracy as much as the next person, but the secular dictators are what kept Islamic extremism in check. In this case, the dictators are the lesser evils. Which is why people accept that Bashar Al Assad won the Syrian civil war instead of placing faith on any of the opposition to rule, some of whom are Islamists.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I would, quite frankly, rather live in a world with more democracies and more extremists than a world with fewer of both.

            Liberal Democracy is the only acceptable form of governance.

            • crackajack@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Liberal democracy only works if people are A) well educated and informed and B) have a strong identity as a group. Societies need to be well informed on issues and work towards finding solutions that benefit all. Unfortunately, many countries lack either or both.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            from beyond the international community.

            I know it’s not your point but this implies asking aliens and I think that’s fun.

            As to your article, I am not and have never defended the Iraq War. Iraq is still a democracy, and I hope it remains one forever. That would be the absolute least the people of Iraq deserve after that war.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They absolutely would not be far right in Japan and a few more on this map, but they would be right to far right in a lot of countries not on the map too.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m mostly poking fun. Some people will say rest of the world and really just mean Western Europe. You’re mostly right though. I think economically, yes, definitely right or at least right of center. Socially though, very left. LGBT rights and civil equality and refugee acceptance are sadly not the norm. We’ve still got serious conservative parties pushing against them.

        It’s honestly a hard thing to distill down to one metric. And if you want to consider the cultural context too, it gets even more difficult. People like using the whole world in comparisons, but it’s rather complex to accurately do that here.