• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You think the DNC is pushing this? Or is this just throwing shit to throw shit?

    Vote blue still applies here. I don’t know who told you it doesn’t.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The DNC sure as hell isn’t pushing Mamdani, is the point.

      Whether they’ll put their enormous propaganda machine behind Cuomo, Adams, or none of the candidates remains to be seen, but you can bet your bottom dollar that they won’t be going anywhere near as hard for the progressive running under their banner as they have for both of the Republicans in all but name he’s running against in the past.

      The DNC leadership is almost half as corrupt and hypocritical as the fascist party they pretend to be the only possible alternative to.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Nope, that’s what factually is happening.

          Just because the Neoliberals from your favorite billionaire-owned media says something doesn’t make it true.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Well, let’s see what happens. If the Democratic establishment pushes Mamdani hard, this will be true.

      The person you’re replying to is just used to the establishment fighting against progressive insurgents.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If the Democratic establishment pushes Mamdani hard

        Sure, and pigs might fly!

        Never forget that it was a coalition led by the Dem leadership on behalf of AIPAC that ousted both Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman.

        They always fight tooth and nail against progressives and roll over on most of the demands of the fascists in the name of “bipartisanship”

        The person you’re replying to is just used to the establishment fighting against progressive insurgents.

        As is anyone who’s ever paid attention 🤷

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You think the DNC is pushing this?

      I think they’re going to be more open about doing so as the election approaches.

      Vote blue still applies here.

      Progressives step aside when centrists win the primaries that the party went to court for the right to rig.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        the party went to court for the right to rig.

        Not a fair interpretation of an argument made by a single DNC lawyer in a single context. Also, the primary is over and Mamdani won.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Not a fair interpretation of an argument made by a single DNC lawyer in a single context.

          A completely accurate representation, made by a lawyer representing the party and setting precedent they have taken advantage of ever since.

          Also, the primary is over and Mamdani won.

          I’m not sorry that the party’s machinations against the left fail sometimes.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It’s accurate that their lawyer made that true argument. That’s just how party primaries work in the US, unfortunately. It’s not accurate that “the party went to court for the right to rig”. The whole point of the argument was to avoid a potentially long and expensive case from moving forward. The context matters, and the lawyer would have been incompetent not to bring it up, as would a Republican or even Green party lawyer in that situation.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              That’s an overly charitable interpretation.

              What actually happened was that progressives sued the DNC for unfairly rigging the primaries, which they did.

              Rather than try to deny it, they went with the tactic of saying “well we’re allowed to because we own the process, not the voters”.

              This in spite of their own charter mandating that they stay neutral and not favor any candidate over others during the primary process.