A homeowner in Goodyear, Arizona is locked in a dispute with his homeowner’s association over his practice of distributing free cold water from his driveway.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    You guys are wrong. The city handles what overflows onto ITS property, they don’t care about your property. That’s what the HOA is for.

    You can’t leave your trash on the sidewalk (city property) randomly, the city can’t do jack shit if some slob leaves his trash on his lawn.

    Until rats set in. You guys comfortable leaving things degenerate to that level until the city acts?

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      They can where I live. While I might “own” the land, I’m in Canada and there’s a very specific and technical legal definition, I never “own” anything. The land is owned by the crown, and we lowly peons get to “buy” (or lease in perpetuity for a one time set cost, plus property taxes every year) the land we live on.

      The Crown, and by extension, the government acting on behalf of the crown, can do whatever the fuck they want, including telling you what you can, and cannot do with your land, and whether you can turn it into a trash heap.

      Many other places are the same, though, not as technically/legally screwed; I don’t have to look any further than city zoning to know that similar (in effect, not implementation) rules exist for everyone. Zoning means you can’t just turn your plot of land into an industrial manufacturing operation because you feel like it. That’s the government telling you what you can (or cannot) do with your property. There’s plenty more examples and rules that limit people’s freedoms as to what they can do with “their” property, if you do any research at all.

      Don’t be such a spoon.

    • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is straight up not true in many places. Where I live they have a long list of things you can’t have in your yard, or in your yard for extended periods of time. They have a list of rules for the flora, maintenance, etc.

      The only time your assumption is true is the inside of the house. They can’t do much there until it is a fire hazard, bio hazard, etc. , but that level of hoarding stuff is not common, and even then, there are limits to it before the city intervenes

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      You are the one who is clueless. My city absolutely will fine people for violating the upkeep laws. I know because I’ve been fined for grass before, and I know one of my neighbors had an abandoned, rotting car towed out of their driveway.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s my point. They’ll do something when it’s three feet tall, but maybe I want the neighbor to cut it before it reaches that level?

        • Null User Object@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s my point.

          No, that wasn’t your point. Now you’re moving the goal post. Your point was, and I quote,

          The city handles what overflows onto ITS property, they don’t care about your property.

          Plus, the article explicitly states that the ordinance specifies 12 inches, not three feet.

          You can keep digging your hole deeper, but it’s not going to support your claim. Your just wrong here, and one sign of a well adjusted adult is knowing when to admit they’re wrong.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            They don’t care about your property, right. No one wants 12 inch grass.

            It is you who is wrong. The HOAs exist to make people respect human living conditions, not the contractor-grade specs the city enforces for its purposes.

            Try to picture a city with just the city rules enforced. All right, it’s 1 foot tall grass, not three feet. OK, it’s three trash bags with rats, not 12.

            That enough? Of course it isn’t.

            The grass matters to the city when it overflows onto its property. One hopes that in the vast majority of cases, people will maintain their property a bit better on their own. The HOA just makes it possible to ensure that. The vast majority of HOAs aren’t PITAs, only the extreme stories make it to the news.

            If you like your lawn 1 foot tall with trash bags everywhere, move to where there is no HOA. I realize there are fewer and fewer trailer parks these days, but that’s not my fault.

            I don’t know how to put it simpler.

            " Your just wrong here, and one sign of a well adjusted adult is knowing when to admit they’re wrong."

            It’s “you’re”, and I’m not, and take your own advice.

            • Nate Cox@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              So are you just trying to be an ass here, or are you genuinely just so invested that you can’t see you’re arguing in bad faith?