• Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You don’t understand, ICE was deporting brown people when we thought they were terrorists, now that ICE is deporting brown people because Trump thinks they’re terrorists, it’s now evil.

  • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Wait no you can’t do that! The Democrats would never eat my face, I can only conceive of that happening to Republicans

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    There needs to be some kind of immigration enforcement just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process. This requires some level of funding, and due to inflation and growing populations it will always result in record breaking funding at some point.

    Democrats were denouncing ICE in 2017-2020 because the administration was ordering ICE to pursue practices like stealing children. They are denouncing them now because ICE is kidnapping people off the street and when they show up for court hearings when they are complying with court orders.

    This list implies that the Dems are wrong for ever funding ICE and that they are hypocrites for complaining when Republicans are in power. But it glosses over the nuance that ICE really is used far more maliciously when Trump is in power and that denouncing of the specific actions of ICE are completely valid because those are their jackboot thug years.

    Dems are shitty on immigration because they are complicit with lowering immigration maximums and excluding too many people while not promoting reforms that improve how ICE behaves. But it isn’t the same thing as supporting the ICEstappo when in office, because they dial it back to a shitty level instead of full on villain mode.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process.

      United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) handles this. They and ICE were founded in 2002 along Customs and Border Patrol. ICE is the result of the merging of two separate enforcement agencies: part of the US Customs Services and the enforcement arm of the Immigration and Naturalization Services.

      Illegal entries caught within 100 miles of the border weren’t classified as deportations until the George W. Bush administration. Obama was colloquially known as Deporter in Chief for these high numbers.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There needs to be some kind of immigration enforcement just to handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process.

      No there doesn’t. We don’t have anything similar like a dedicated anti-immigration police in Canada or in the EU. There are border protection agencies and there are immigration bureaucracies, but this special immigration police thing going on in the US, is not a thing.

      • Willy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Ice is a newish agency formed after 9/11 with the also dystopianly named DHS. It was a product of the time of patriot acts and TSA. None of them are needed or helpful or going away.

      • Aa!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        What makes you think “handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process” had to include anti-immigration police?

        I get the feeling you don’t disagree with the parent commenter at all.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          ICE is a law enforcement agency. It’s a police. With a special immigration mandate.

          I guess I am not clear what is meant by “handle the processing of people as they complete the immigration process”. In Canada, things like applications and forms are handled by IRCC, the immigration ministry. Other than that, there is CBSA, which is like your CBP, but we don’t have a specialized interior immigration police.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Absolutely. The solution is comprehensive immigration reform. Until Congress passes it, we will continue to deport people due to our overcomplicated and flawed system.

      It’s also important to note that more immigrants cross the border under Democratic presidents, and most deportations under those presidents are people caught at the border, versus the rounding up and deporting of working, tax-paying immigrants who have been here for years.

      CBP vs ICE

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Yes, which is why ICE and all immigration enforcement under Trump is many, many times worse than under the Dems and still would be even if the reforms were in place because Trump is ignoring the laws and court orders that should be preventing him from deporting people to 3rd party countries just like he ignored the orders against separating children from parents.

        Even if the Dems were sugar and spice and everything nice we would still have some kind of immigration enforcement in place and it would have been twisted into to what it is now because conservatives don’t care about following the laws they dislike.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          True. It’s long overdue regardless. We are still using the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). Obama pushed for immigration reform, but all Congress was able to pass with a weak majority was DACA in 2012.

          Republicans want a broken system so they have a scapegoat for elections.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        That’s a lot of links. Which one is about Obama directing ICE to steal children from families instead of incarcerating them together in family detention or deporting them together?

        I said they dial it back to shitty levels which are not as bad as masked plainclothes agents in unmarked cars kidnapping people on the street or stealing children while families are detained.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Obama had a nickname. “Deporter in Chief”.

          Obama did the things you described. The excuse is that Obama did not do it “systematically”. But he did it a few times and got away with it. Thus setting a precedent for Trump to do the same thing a lot of times.

          Obama administration kicks off family deportation raids

          Do you even remember that Obama built the cages?

          Obama builds a concentration camp and then people act surprised that a Republican comes in and uses it as a concentration camp? The selective outrage here is astounding.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    If the world were a binary meme world this might make sense, but it’s more like saying stuff happened during the day… night… day… night…

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      everyone who gives a fuck knows republicans are the problem, what many people don’t realize is that the democrats merrily sit at the same table as republicans, so people need to be informed about that so they can recognize that both parties are shit and there needs to be actual change.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      They’re both problems, and fixing the Democrats is the solution to both problems. Democrats repeatedly embracing the status quo is what lets Republicans keep winning, and Republicans won’t change as long as they’re winning.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        A good third of the country is dumber than rocks and closer to evil than any other plurality in recent history besides Nazi Germany and Zionists (they’re literally the same ethnocultural group at large, lol). How is that supposed to be fixed by a Democrat winning anything?

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So who’s supposed to oppose the Republicans who we know are responsible for most bad things happening?

      Because if the democrats aren’t interested in opposing them we need another party that’s willing to oppose Republicans.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        So who’s supposed to oppose the Republicans

        Democrats, to the best of their willingness.

        And it’s on us to force ranked choice voting so we don’t have only two fucking options.

    • Bleys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Weird how all these anti-Democrats think that the only competitive left party in the US failing will somehow lead to the Republicans relinquishing power instead of consolidating it.

      Russia had two or three fair elections after the fall of the Soviet Union, until Putin came into power and now he “wins” every election with 98% of the vote.

      But I’m sure if the Democratic Party disappeared tomorrow then somehow Republicans would just give up their power. Lol.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        And all of these “vote-blue or die” people are the reason the Dems are totally fucking useless and only pretend to care.

        Protip, you can still vote blue while still they are totally fucking useless clowns, sucking their dick while you do it doesnt change anything.

        • Bleys@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Lol bro, go ahead and don’t vote then. Maybe if we let the GOP win all three branches uncontested for the next century and they dismantle education, gerrymander or just outright remove fair elections, and kill the planet with climate change, then people will feel really bad and adopt your politics. It’s worked so many times in the past.

          Also there’s a difference between valid criticisms of the Democratic Party and this post which is demonizing them on the same level as the GOP simply because Democrats spent money on their border patrol. As if Obama or Biden were the ones who introduced Alligator Alcatraz.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        We are ready to support the Democratic party whenever they intend to use their power to enact any positive change.

        We’re still waiting.

        I’ve been waiting my entire life.

        • Bleys@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The party whose Supreme Court justices were responsible for all gay rights advancements, always vote to protect abortion rights, passed Obamacare to helps millions of Americans out, vs. a Republican party that has done literally everything in their power to empower their largest donors, and more recently has existed for the sole purpose of enriching the Trump family?

          If you can’t see the difference between the two then you’re either being willfully obtuse or you’re a subversive agent for the GOP. My money is on the latter honestly.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Any party that allows wealth inequality to grow is not interested in fixing problems, just masking the symptoms.

            • Bleys@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              If you were in the trolley problem and the trolley was headed towards a million people, I can imagine you opting not to pull the lever to switch it to a single person because you won’t act unless there’s a perfect option with zero casualties.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Average Lemmy user, “There is no difference between the politician on the left and the politician on the right.”

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Anyone who knows the guy on the left: “Hindenburg went out of his way to empower Hitler and the Nazis when it was clear that his coalition was failing. Instead of working with the Social Democrats, he empowered the Nazi. Without his choices, there’s a chance that the Hitler wouldn’t have come to power. He’s an awful person.”

      You: “so you think there’s no difference between the two?!”

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The guy on the left appointed Hitler and then gave him power with the Enabling Act and aided in giving him unchecked powers.

      So without Hindenburg, Hitler wouldn’t have been put into power. So he’s far from a good guy.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        . So he’s far from a good guy.

        That was my point. One is bad, the other is pure evil. Lemmy: " I see no difference."

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The only two who tried to shoot Trump were right wing. I have seen any leftists/socialists try and stop Trump either.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Shooting Trump wouldn’t really help? He’d just become a martyr for MAGA and JD Vance would do all the shit Trump was going to do, but also use the assassination as an excuse to deport leftists.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 minutes ago

              If you kill Hitler and aren’t organized enough to take advantage of the infighting (or assassinate the rest of Nazi leadership) then one of the other Nazis will just slide into his place. It’s not like there are a shortage of potential Hitlers around.

              Assassination has to be part of a larger, more organized political project or it doesn’t really accomplish anything.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I was just going to point out that deportations were higher under Biden.

      Then I remembered who that guy in the picture is!

      Hindenburg literally appointed Hitler chancellor, approved the Reichstag Fire Decree, and gave the Nazis emergency powers by singing the Enabling Act of 1933. Do you not even credit him slightly for the rise of Hitler and the Nazis?

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s kind of the idea I was thinking of. Lemmy users would focus on the bad of Hindenburg and declare him identical to Hitler. Hindenburg wasn’t a saint but it’s wrong to say there’s no difference between Hindenburg and Hitler.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      How does this post say there is no difference?

      Instead your comments tend to be similar to how republicans always claim “It is fine when my team does it”

      Do you have anything better than using an ad hominem?

      • Bleys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You realize every country has border patrol, right? Spending money on your border patrol agency isn’t inherently evil. Denmark is one of the most “socialist” countries in the world, but they also have one of the strictest border policies.

        ICE under Obama was very different to ICE under Trump.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Funding ICE and even reducing the budget while following normal legal procedures is a gigantic difference between Trump increasing ICE 3X and performing illegal deportations.

        It’s not an ad hominem, it’s a comparison.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago
    1. Between 2011 and 2015 the ICE budget stayed the same or fell in 2 years.

    2. Democrats enforced Obama era rules of 72 hour holding limitations for women and children, and followed a criminal-only persecution which actually deported more people than Trump despite the number of cages Trump filled. Thats what this is all about. Trump is filling cages for the private prison industry’s profits.

    If you don’t want the DNC to compromise then elect more than 50 of them to the Senate, and a strong house majority.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      why /s?

      if you want anything to change, vote, if you don’t agree with any candidate, vote third party

      elections are usually very close, if a third party is polling at about a few percentage points, major parties will bend over backwards to get those votes.

      that’s how we got Brexit (a bad thing) but it was weaponised third parties.