• PTSDwarrior@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s no longer fun and games #resist bullshit. We are on the brink of a civil war/revolution. Many more people are realizing this.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Meanwhiie you’ll have to push back against lying bootlickers like Tim Pool & TheQuartering

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So, I attended my local protest. 9/10 experience, had a blast and also realized that being anti-Trump and keeping our republic is a waaaaaaaay more popular position (even in my light red area) than I thought it was. The local police department has its priorities straight and they didn’t show up to the protest at all, so there were zero problems with law enforcement. The only thing keeping it from being a 10/10 was what I didn’t see:

    1. Clear demands. This was what happened with Occupy. It generated a lot of buzz and got tons of attention, and when they finally asked the protestors “what are your demands?”, the answer was basically “idk, everything sucks. Make it stop sucking”. We need some clear, hard, attainable demands or we’re just going to repeat Occupy.

    2. Organizing. There was almost no organizing happening, no outreach or recruiting for or between political, advocacy, or support groups. People showed up and left with no additional contacts, commitments, or follow ups. That is a wasted opportunity.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, I love the no kings energy but we need to turn it into political action. Every politician who isn’t on board needs to fear for their job. Both Republican and Democrat alike. David Hogg has the right idea.

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Initially, wasn’t Occupy a protest about the post-recession bank bailouts? Then the production team for Good Morning America put a self-proclaimed representative of Occupy, a “female-presenting person” named Ketchup, in the studio to ask them questions about it, and they had no media coaching whatsoever.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    A geriatric protest LMAO 🤣

    Wait. Are there people just mad because they don’t understand computers? Oof 😅

    Anyway best place to resist is cast your vote. Like in election day

    Bit late for that

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Now if only those same 4-6 million people would go on general strike until the government is forced to resign and trigger new elections.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Unrealistic. No politician is going to voluntarily give up their job. Instead aim for making them quake in their boots and afraid they will lose their job in a year and a half if they don’t hold Trump accountable for his constitutional violations. Make them oust Mike Johnston as Speaker and elect someone less radical at the very least.

      Edit: all that is needed is for a handful of Republicans to defect from the party line and it’s kowtow to Trump. Oh, and for the Democrats to stop cowering in the corner and step up to do their fucking job. Not sure which is the harder prospect.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The movement is getting larger and louder each cycle. Protests like this dont bring down the government directly, but are demonstration that a movement has support

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Agreed. I think a lot of people in light red and purple areas probably had my same experience of being really surprised at the amount of support there was. The occupy protest in my city was like three dudes in two tents. The No Kings protests stretched for three city blocks and we got a ton of enthusiastic responses (and only, like, three counter protests that I saw) from people driving through. I never ever would have imagined that kind of turnout and support in this town, and I found myself feeling really encouraged that there’s a lot more local support for resisting this bullshit than I estimated.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Way way too much stock is placed in that study.

      For one, their total sample size was only 323 events, only 3 of which met the “3.5%” level. So the statement that change is inevitable based on only 3 instances is really crazy.

      Further, none of those three instances had participants thinking that 3.5% was some sort of goal, it was a correlation. So now you have a lot of protestors treating 3.5% as a goal rather than some organic emergent property of the broader movement. Even if there was something inevitable about having a 3.5% participation rate when no one is aware of that metric, simply knowing of the metric can change a lot.

      • ramenbelly@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yea I think you can have 35% of the country at the steps of the White House , Trump ain’t stepping down

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That number keeps getting thrown around but this admin dgaf. That number only works when the admin believes in human rights and when the admin cares about it’s popularity.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Would you say that Ferdinand Marcos believed in human rights and did not care for his popularity?

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Turns out someone who looks like Luigi but is definitely not Luigi proved it takes only one death certificate to initiate change for scores of people

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          But nothing changed… Can you show a change in healthcare since? have acceptance rates gone up? premiums gone down?

          Nothing changed.

          Edit: Bunch of downvotes… but nobody can tell me anything that’s changed… interesting isn’t it?

          • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Several health insurers reversed some of their latest shitty policies within days of the event. Like the one that would put a time limit in the anesthesia they’d pay for. That’s an immediate course change from hundred billion dollar companies.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Like the one that would put a time limit in the anesthesia they’d pay for.

              https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2024/12/06/anthem-blue-cross-blue-shield-reverses-planned-anesthesia-time-limits-after-intense-pushback/

              Elected officials in Connecticut and New York both said they stepped in Thursday to intervene with Anthem’s new plan before the company announced the reversal. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said on X, formerly known as Twitter, the change was “outrageous” and she would “make sure New Yorkers are protected.” Connecticut’s comptroller Sean Scanlon said his office had already reached out to Anthem and the policy would “no longer be going into effect here in Connecticut.” Scanlon shared that update hours before Anthem announced the reversal.

              • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                So a could politicians managed to block it in just their states, but the company reversed it for everyone… And you think that somehow refutes what I said?

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Yes… Anthem is a subsidiary of BCBS that operates geographically and doesn’t compete with other BCBS subsidiary…

                  So literally yes. If they were blocked in their few geo locations… Literally yes.

                  Edit: They service 8 states. When your biggest state says “fuck no” to your new policy… you reevaluate or roll-back (or go to lawsuit).

              • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Well that’s settled then, politicians would never lie to provide cover for companies. Nothing else that happened that week could have explained it, the government has done this so often (without even announcing it to the people they want votes from) that this is for sure the only explanation.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Apart from all the claims that were suddenly approved or execs of other companies suddenly removing all personal info from websites?

            Fear. Nothing meaningful will change until the rich fear for their lives, and we saw just how much they’re scrambling after 1 CEO.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Apart from all the claims that were suddenly approved

              Source this please… To date, I still see United Healthcare at dead bottom. And rate fluctuating only nominally over the past 12 months.

              execs of other companies suddenly removing all personal info from websites?

              If you’re counting this as a meaningful change to healthcare… Then I guess you found one that I can’t contest. Congrats!

              Fear. Nothing meaningful will change until the rich fear for their lives, and we saw just how much they’re scrambling after 1 CEO.

              No, this is my point. Even with “fear” nothing changed.

              • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                They need to fear more, clearly.

                Y’all tried tens of thousands of protests but are giving up at one CEO? That’s a shitty sample size.

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And Gandhi didn’t do jack shit.

          Only once violent resistance had forced the Brits away they went “oh by the way it was totally the guy who would have laid down in the street to be flattened by our tanks, in case anyone else wants to try it”

      • seejur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It only works when you are near an election, and the election are coming. This administration is working on a different path: at least one year before the next election and is actively working to make sure (fair) elections might not happen anymore

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The cited scenarios were rarely democratic in nature.

          Of course, in all the scenarios cited, there was no one telling them “get to 3.5% and things will happen”, so with everyone saying “if we get to 3.5%, things will happen”, that could itself break the “rule”, as a sort of self-denying prophecy.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      What do you suppose happens at this magic threshold? I’ll give you a hint- it’s nothing. We still have to do the work to actually make a difference. Protesting and building momentum is good, but we can’t just wait until we hit this magic threshold and pretend that will fix everything and rest on our laurels.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is the right take. There’s more that goes into than just achieving that number. It is necessary, but not sufficient.

      • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        This

        Anyone else remember how the Women’s March saved reproductive rights? Of course not, and now women are dying in Texas because doctors are afraid they’ll be arrested for murder if they treat them for life threatening conditions.

  • Ænima@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I attended my first protest yesterday, alone, while my wife watched my boy play at a park. Minus a couple of neckbeards in raised trucks sporting Confederate and tRump flags, it was a great experience. Lots of support from drivers as they passed by!

    I was surprised at how many older people were there. No offense to anyone over 60 here, but until yesterday it felt like many older folks were fine with shit going down this way. I’m in a blue state, in a purple to blue location. I saw way more tRump shit last year than I had hoped to see.

    I plan on making yesterday a regular event!

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s interesting, I’m in a red state, purple location, and it was the other way around. The first 2 protests I went to in April (Hands Off and another one), it seemed like over 80% were (myself included) 50+ yo white people. Then yesterday I was happy to see lots more younger people and more ethnic diversity (though still whiter compared to proportion of the population). I saw more couples with their kids there too, and there were twice as many people overall.

    • PodPerson@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had the same experience. First protest I’ve been to and besides one dude that drove by flipping everyone off and one crazy old dude with a “dems are pedos” sign (yes, with what’s happening in South Carolina literally right now, the irony was lost on this person), a very positive mood all around. Loads of folks driving by, waving and honking horns, some kids in attendance, and everybody getting along very well in support of a common cause.

      • Ænima@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m a firm believer that many in MAGA are under a spell. The only hope we have is helping them identify that brainwashing and welcome them back to humanity once they do. However, as I’ve discussed with my therapist, we can’t force them. They have to want to change. It really starts with pushing them from the hateful rhetoric of Faux News and the like. That propaganda is a powerful funnel for their hate, vitriol, and lies. It’s the hydra that we must slain if we are ever to fix this without more bloodshed.

        I’ll see you out there in solidarity with the others who still see humanity as a fighting cause. I bounce between hope and despair, but the bounce on the hope side doesn’t seem to go as high as it used to.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      in my suburb the local stuff was sorta sad because it was mostly old, but granted younger folks are more likely to trek downtown.

    • Pnut@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re a brave person. If I had a kid and a wife I would have thought twice. Which I’m sure you did. Thank you for your service. I hope you had a nice time with your family after. Feel proud. Be safe. I’d buy you a beer if I wasn’t hundreds of miles away.

      • Ænima@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I appreciate the sentiment. I joined the Guard out of high school in 2004 to help my community and have a sense of purpose. Yesterday showed me that maybe it wasn’t in vain. I hit a pretty low place this week so seeing some positive affirmations of human commradery was a welcomed sight.

        Stay safe and stay hydrated. Much love from the midwest!

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Lots of kids joined their parents at the one I was at. These were by design peaceful events. Cops and haters did things at a few, but that was it

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The fact that he can do all of this and face zero opposition within government and didn’t even get punished once he was out of office (despite popular demand) kind of proves you didn’t have a democracy to begin with.

      Where was democracy when Bush’s brother stole the election for him?

    • LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a totally unfair and inaccurate comment. He already tore apart democracy when he deliberately incited jan 6th. Please give the megalomaniac appropriate credit in future

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      He tried his damndest to tear apart democracy back then too. It’s just that there were still some safeguards in place, and people running things who weren’t his sycophants. His first term would’ve gone exactly like this if he’d been able to. He wasn’t a nuisance. He’s an extremely dangerous man.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is a bit OT from the main point of the article, but since they brought it up and used the standard "The worst ratings for any president!!!1! hype [always with qualifying statement like “at this point in their term”| “since some convenient year”]

    Trump’s approval in our polling average is 44% today, the worst for any president at this point in their term (except Trump during his first term) going back to 1935.

    It’s 44% today, 44% yesterday, and 44% tomorrow. It’s always in the low-mid forties (40-45%). It’s steady as a rock, no matter what happens. Yet I’m continuously seeing articles titled “Trump’s ratings nosedive/plummet/crash!” whenever it fluctuates down by a point or two (never “Trump’s ratings skyrocket!” when it goes back up a point). It’s all for feel-good propaganda.

    This is just to say, don’t depend on his followers to turn their backs on him–they won’t. It’s up to the rest of us.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      At the end of this term, George W Bush had around 30% approval. By that point, his administration had so obviously failed in multiple avenues that even Republicans were disowning him. By mid 2009, the Tea Party was pretending they weren’t the same exact people who supported his every major action in the first place.

      That 30% number can be taken as close to an absolute floor of support for any sitting President.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yep, and Trump has never been anywhere near that low or ever will be, no matter what he does. It’s a cult of true believers. Only a tiny fraction of his voters have had misgivings since the 2nd term started, not enough to sway his approval ratings by more than a percentage point. IOW anyone who would stop supporting him because of his criminal behavior already did. The remainder are all in on what he’s doing and love him. The fact that it’s such a high percentage of our population is what bothers me as much as anything else about this.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I attended the Warped Tour 30th anniversary festival in DC instead of giving Trumps dumbass military parade any attention. Does that count as a protest?

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      And DC was barricading the shit out of the parade route the day before, almost expecting a riot to occur.

      • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Trump was begging for violence yesterday. Any excuse to send troops in. He got jack shit. It was a good day.

        I love America and its service men and women. They deserve a parade and acknowledgment. But not a parade masked as a tyrants bday.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Okay but here me out, a military parade where they can wear anything they want so long as it was at some point a uniform of their branch. IE if someone in the Navy wants to dress in a Barbary war era uniform let them. I want to see what bullshit people could dig up.

            • HubertManne@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              no way man. we are celebrating these people. why inflict restrictions on them when we are honoring them. Im fine with those who want to wearing their uniforms.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                You misunderstand me, the ONLY restriction is that it has to have been a uniform from their branch at some point. In theory depending on the branch you could have people dressed up as basically NCR rangers from Fallout New Vegas, I basically want to harness the controlled chaos of Halloween but with military uniforms.

                • HubertManne@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I really did not misunderstand. I want the people we are celebrating to wear anything at all they want with zero restriction. jeans and t-shirt, nice dress, uniform, whatever. If we are celebrating them then it only makes sense they do what they want to do. Attendance should not be mandatory but there should be nice perks for them if they come like food and drink and maybe a bit of swag gift bags. Let them self organize things they want to do like a school talent show. Maybe some play instruments and maybe some like the pugilist stuff they do a little choreographed presentation as they go. Let them design floats as they like and provide enough resoures to do this stuff.

  • dinren@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Awesome. Now, do it next weekend too. Because once per year isn’t going to do anything.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Most of them likely voted. The 2024 general election had about 65% turnout. The protesters only make up a few percent of the population.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      The ones I was with had voted early, and were out canvassing. The kids were under 18.

      That said, a lot of people are sufficiently disconnected from the news that they didn’t get how much worse Trump would be this time.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let’s hope we can keep it up this time. Americans in social movements are famous for a big countdown, then no blastoff.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sorry to be a downer but, wake me up when something comes of it. I don’t think the Nazis were defeated last time with peaceful protest.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Whatever you need to tell yourself to justify your preferred mode of sitting on your ass and doing nothing.

          Justification:

          I don’t live in the States.

          Result:

          sitting on your ass and doing nothing [while complaining online about how other people are not doing enough]

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      wake me up when something comes of it.

      I don’t live in the States.

      What is the point of posting that then? Are you being paid to suppress opposition to the regime by by fomenting hopelessness or apathy, or is trying to discourage people during a time of crisis in their country just for your own amusement or ego-stroking.

      Things lead to more things, and it starts with people coming together, organizing, and protesting. The Trump+Christian Nationalist regime wants us to shut up and sit down, to nip any resistance in the bud. You’re helping them.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sure, I’m trying to get people to shut up and sit down with the strong implication in my original comment that more action is required to fix a fascist regime.

      • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        What is the point of posting that then? Are you being paid to suppress opposition to the regime by by fomenting hopelessness or apathy, or is trying to discourage people during a time of crisis in their country just for your own amusement or ego-stroking.

        If you guys want to take action and fight, I’ll join you. I’m British-Canadian. I’m always in for a good White House burning.

        If you want to wave stupid signs that change nothing, I’ll point and laugh.

        • leadore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I’ll just respond by quoting someone from another thread replying to someone like you: “Keep your doomer bullshit to yourself, shut the fuck up, and get out of the way.”