Years earlier, she had asked a boss if he would let his children fly on a plane with the litany of flaws and non-conformances he was urging her to “pencil-whip”: “Cindy, none of these planes are staying in America, they’re all going overseas,” he retorted, much to her horror.

    • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Black Rock basically owns the entire stock market. Even the best intentioned companies eventually have to cave to fiduciary duty to shareholders.

      • kayky@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s why going public is a sign the owners no longer care about the business and only care about fleecing us as much as possible.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Black Rock owns absolutely fuck-all. It only manages the 401ks of normal people like you and me, and STOLE OUR SHAREHOLDER VOTING RIGHTS.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah these headlines always grind my gears. Even the equity they don’t steal, they leverage as if their own assets. They’re fucking mine and yours.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, it really doesn’t. Assets under management (not owned) 11.5 trillion, while the American stock market alone is worth around 50.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Yes. Unambigiously.

            What would you rather have, one person with a ton of power making decisions, or abstract it out over a group and diffuse all responsibility?

            Both are bad, but one of them has a (likely not morally great) person at the top, the other has lots of robber barons sharing ownership and collectively demanding line go up

            A person isn’t usually dumb enough to fire half their workforce, because they know their bread and butter comes from that workforce. A consulting company advising the business and shareholders at the same time can easily do such stupidity for short term profits