The timing of the Flight 8 failure was similar to Flight 7 in January, which also featured several engine shutdowns and a loss of communications about eight and a half minutes after liftoff. However, SpaceX says the two failures had different causes.

“While the failure manifested at a similar point in the flight timeline as Starship’s seventh flight test, it is worth noting that the failures are distinctly different,” the company stated.

In the case of Flight 8, SpaceX said one of the center Raptor engines in Starship suffered a hardware failure, details of which the company did not disclose. That failure enabled “inadvertent propellant mixing and ignition” that caused the loss of the Raptor. Immediately thereafter, the other two center Raptor engines shut down, along with one of the three outer vacuum-optimized engines with larger nozzles. The vehicle then lost control authority.

The company said it made changes to the Raptors in the Starship upper stage, with “additional preload” on key joints and a new nitrogen purge system as well as improvements to the propellant drain system. A future version of Raptor in development will also have reliability improvements to address the problem seen on Flight 8.

On Flight 7 in January, SpaceX, said the vehicle suffered a harmonic response several times stronger than expected, creating additional stress on the vehicle’s propulsion system. That caused leaks that triggered a fire in the engine bay.

“The mitigations put in place after Starship’s seventh flight test to address harmonic response and flammability of the ship’s attic section worked as designed prior to the failure on Flight 8,” SpaceX said.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hey, ngl, I used to watch every single one of these - I would set alarms to wake up for weird launch times and everything. But now, I’ve fully stopped caring. Kinda hard to give a shit when the guy who owns the thing is an overt fascist and is aggressively helping to tear apart the country and what remains of it’s government and turn it into an authoritarian hellscape.

    Inb4 tHiS isN’t a PoLitiCAL cOmMuniTy - we don’t live in a vacuum, and SpaceX losing its shine due to massive, obvious insider dealing as a direct result of the overtly fascist CEO being tied at the hip to our scintillatingly fascist ruling regime kinda kills my enthusiasm for literally anything he’s affiliated with.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Plus, other space companies are starting to do interesting stuff too. SpaceX isn’t the only player in new space any more.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Also, when NASA granted the HLS contract to SpaceX, I’ll give you one single guess where the director of that program used went to work.

          • ptfrd@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Are you saying that the person who was director of NASA’s HLS program, at the time it granted a contract to SpaceX, had previously worked at SpaceX?

            • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Sorry, no, I got it the other way around:

              Kathryn Lueders, the program manager for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program granted SpaceX the HLS contract (after personally telling ONLY SpaceX about the secret maximum bid price, and not the others), because somehow SpaceX suddenly and mysteriously lowered its bid to just below the maximum price. Also, the contract had several requirements around FRR’s waived, but Lueders ONLY informed SpaceX. This is legal somehow.

              In 2021, Lueders granted SpaceX the HLS contract. In November 2022, Lueders added another 1.1 billion for the “option B” (Artemis 4 and on).

              On May 15th 2023, Lueders anounced she’d leave NASA, and start as general manager for Starship, directly below Shotwell.

              On May 31st 2023, under new leadership, Nasa awarded a second contract to Blue Origin for a second moon lander.