Ceasefire:

  • Permanent ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine

  • Immediate initiation of technical implementation negotiations

Security Guarantees for Ukraine:

  • Robust security guarantees for Ukraine

  • Guarantors: a group of European and willing non-European states

  • Ukraine agrees not to pursue NATO membership

  • Ukraine may pursue European Union membership

Territorial Arrangements:

  • Crimea: U.S. grants de jure recognition of Russian control

  • Luhansk: U.S. grants de facto recognition of Russian control

  • Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, Kherson: De facto recognition of Russian control of occupied parts

  • Kharkiv Oblast: Ukraine regains territory

  • Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant & Kakhovka Dam: Ukraine regains control under U.S. administration, energy distributed to both sides

  • Ukraine gains full navigation rights on the Dnieper River and control of the Kinburn Spit

Economic Provisions:

  • U.S.–Ukraine economic and minerals cooperation agreement

  • Full financial compensation and reconstruction of Ukraine

  • Removal of all Russia-related sanctions imposed since 2014

  • Resumption of U.S.–Russia economic cooperation, including energy and industrial sectors

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Russians won’t go with this. They think can gain full control of the four heavily occupied regions.

    Russians are incapable of good faith negotiations. To deal with them you need to be able to show that you are willing and able to use violence against them.

    If you think I am wrong, show me a recent example of good faith actions from russians in the foreign policy sphere since the creation of the modern variant of the russian empire.

    • supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Peace deal or ceasefire that becomes permanent will need to be policed to have any meaning. That means boots on the ground a la South Korea …

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      They may pretend to agree tho, start the ceasefire, then assemble their forces and right before the guarantors set up camp, they do a massive sneak attack. You can’t trust those backstabbers.

      • zabadoh@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I don’t even think they Putin can afford to stop the war.

        FTFY

        Putin has wasted so much blood and treasure, that If he stops the war, he’s as good as dead in Russia’s mafia state.

    • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Russians are incapable of good faith negotiations.

      I believe you mean Russian heads of government and military.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Have to disagree with you on this one, with the clarification that I am refering to matters of geopolitics. What you are implying doesn’t align with factual research and well, historical fact (do not forget that the russians occupied Moldova as far back as the early 90s, putin was no where near power back then).

        Happy to share; there are some really interesting approaches that lay bare the childishness of typical arguments on this topic. “How can you do polling in a country like russia, they are all afraid!” Turns out professionals in this sphere do have methods. 😀

        But I am curious if you have something more concrete that you wanted to expand on with respect to what you are saying or if this just a general thought on your part.

          • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            On one hand I agree with you as I know several russians who are capable of good faith.

            One could say:

            At the very least a strong majority of russians, and more likely an overwhelming majority, are incapable of good faith thinking/negotiations with respect to geopolitics. Even many allegedly opposition-minded “liberal” russians such as Navalniy and his movements has shown support for the annexation of Crimea and denied the genocidal atrocities committed by russians in Chechnya in the 90s.

            I will note that your statement is factually false:

            I believe you mean Russian heads of government and military [are incapable of good faith negotiations].

            This is basically white washing russian genocidal imperialism.

            Again, do you have something concrete to back up the above-mentioned viewed? Surely it should go both ways?

            • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              I will note that your statement is factually false

              It was true. I stated what I believed you to have meant. I didn’t put forth an opinion on it.

              • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                How could you have thought that was true? It would be impossible for me to think that as there is documented evidence to the contrary.

                At any rate, do you have something concrete to say or where you just being pedantic about “all russians” verses “At the very least a strong majority of russians…?”