Ceasefire:

  • Permanent ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine

  • Immediate initiation of technical implementation negotiations

Security Guarantees for Ukraine:

  • Robust security guarantees for Ukraine

  • Guarantors: a group of European and willing non-European states

  • Ukraine agrees not to pursue NATO membership

  • Ukraine may pursue European Union membership

Territorial Arrangements:

  • Crimea: U.S. grants de jure recognition of Russian control

  • Luhansk: U.S. grants de facto recognition of Russian control

  • Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, Kherson: De facto recognition of Russian control of occupied parts

  • Kharkiv Oblast: Ukraine regains territory

  • Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant & Kakhovka Dam: Ukraine regains control under U.S. administration, energy distributed to both sides

  • Ukraine gains full navigation rights on the Dnieper River and control of the Kinburn Spit

Economic Provisions:

  • U.S.–Ukraine economic and minerals cooperation agreement

  • Full financial compensation and reconstruction of Ukraine

  • Removal of all Russia-related sanctions imposed since 2014

  • Resumption of U.S.–Russia economic cooperation, including energy and industrial sectors

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    On one hand I agree with you as I know several russians who are capable of good faith.

    One could say:

    At the very least a strong majority of russians, and more likely an overwhelming majority, are incapable of good faith thinking/negotiations with respect to geopolitics. Even many allegedly opposition-minded “liberal” russians such as Navalniy and his movements has shown support for the annexation of Crimea and denied the genocidal atrocities committed by russians in Chechnya in the 90s.

    I will note that your statement is factually false:

    I believe you mean Russian heads of government and military [are incapable of good faith negotiations].

    This is basically white washing russian genocidal imperialism.

    Again, do you have something concrete to back up the above-mentioned viewed? Surely it should go both ways?

    • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I will note that your statement is factually false

      It was true. I stated what I believed you to have meant. I didn’t put forth an opinion on it.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        How could you have thought that was true? It would be impossible for me to think that as there is documented evidence to the contrary.

        At any rate, do you have something concrete to say or where you just being pedantic about “all russians” verses “At the very least a strong majority of russians…?”