• GrizzlyBur@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They’re done this globally apparently. They just got rid of the provincial park option and defaults all government operated nature reserves, of any government, as “state parks”.

    Seems very shortsighted and with a disregard for other countries. Extremely confusing move by google.

    • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      yea, ‘state park’, as in ‘operated by the state’

      I can see why they did this, but its really stupid, especially at a time like this. i’ve reported half a dozen parks.

      • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        But “the state” at issue here would be Canada. A provincial park isn’t a state park since we have national parks too and they’re separate entities.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        There was no reason to do this other than stay out of Trumps retaliation zone. It is wrong to say operated by the state when it is operated by the province.

        • GrizzlyBur@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          My theory is that some asshole at google thought it was soo much to keep track of what every government globally calls their government operated parks and nature reserves, and just wanted a blanket term for it and went for “state park”, with no consideration for how itd piss most countries off.

          • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 minutes ago

            oh, thats 100% what happened.

            “should we vary what these are called by country?”

            “ehh, that would cost like $10,000 of developer time around the globe, just standardize it”

        • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          No one here is on Trump’s side, so I’m not defending Google, but it is common parlance to refer to the government of a nation as “the state” even when the nation has no states.

      • GrizzlyBur@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yep. Its not technically wrong to call them state parks, but still fuck’em that is our PROVINCIAL park.

        Maybe a small cultural hill we are on right now but we give us enough of these hills and suddenly we lose any semblance of cultural uniqueness.

        • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Oh, 100% agree.

          I’m just saying I understand WHAT they were trying to do, even if it stepped on a cultural landmine. As I said, Ive reported about a dozen parks now myself.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        half a dozen

        Fucking Casual. :-P

        I fully expect they’re gonna close my google account based on the amount of work some poor underpaid kid now has to do. I think I got every park in my province - already a herculean feat - and the one next door. It’s a lotta parks. I’m a little crazy.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Canada really needs to develop its technology to get off of oppressive American tech. We need to work with other countries and develop our own tech to combat this. Absolutely insulting. Just a little “oopsie” after over a decade of not having mislabelled parks? The stink is showing.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      Open source options exist. We just need more people using OpenStreetMaps and shit.

      • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 minutes ago

        As much as i try to update OSM with local knowledge, there’s no way to keep OSM reasonably up to date without automation tools.

        I’m not sure how OSM can replicate whatever tools google uses to constantly update open/close hours, new/dead businesses, bus stops with schedules, etc.

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      A government funded utility that utilizes regional GIS and aerial mapping would go a long way. Google’s got the upper hand on directions and traffic reporting though, so that would take more time to make effective. A lot of that is genuinely due to the number of users that exist on the platform though. I think if you tried to implement similar location data analysis for government infrastructure, people would be up in arms at the idea, despite being perfectly happy to provide the same data to Google.

      It’s unfortunate that Google is as prevalent a default service as they are, but it’s hard to ignore how good a service they offer, and how long the development period has been to get them there.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 minutes ago

      The geodata and related open source technology to edit, review, and host it is already available from openstreetmap community

      • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Then let’s start naming them and putting them out there. If they’re just maps but we need guis for apps on these, then it’s a great time to start that process and get developers in on it, preferably open sourced if possible.

        My guess is there would be lots of developers willing to work on a project like this to help distance us from America.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I’m not seeing this at all.

    Provincial Parks in BC are all still called ‘xyz provincial park’.

    If you explicitly search for ‘state park’ all the provincial ones come up, but there’s nothing in any of their details mentioning ‘state’ in anyway.

    /edit: found it.

    It’s subtle, but it’s there.

  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    The app is showing provincial and national for me. I’m in NS and have a few around the city and they aren’t mislabeled from what I see.🤷🏻‍♂️

    Either I’m the odd one out or they changed it back.

    Edit: found one, how have you been reporting this?

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Just the provincial parks? I was about to get out the pitchforks, but if it doesn’t include national parks that seems unrelated to the drama.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the orange utan asked Google to “make a mistake” on purpose, to float the idea and see what would happen.

  • potate@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just checked and sure enough, nearby provincial parks are labelled ‘State Park’