Reposting this from here from 2023, after I stumbled across it tonight and it hits hard.

The text in the image:

I love my smart TV. I love the way it takes a long time to boot up because it’s trying to refresh the advertisements on the home screen. I delight in the way it randomly restarts because it’s downloaded an update without asking me, each of which makes the TV slower and slower with every subsequent install. I adore the way it buries the apps that I want to use, and that I use without fail every single time, below the apps that it’s being paid to promote and which I have never touched in my life and would never use without the cold metal of a glock pressed hard against my sweating temple. I am infinitely thrilled by the way the interface lags constantly, due to the need to have one thousand unnecessary animations rendered on hardware ripped wholesale from a ten year old phone. I feel myself borne aloft on wings of pure joy when I am notified that my data will be collected and analysed to determine my usage patterns. Even now I am writing this from a field of beautiful flowers and soft luscious grass as I lie and look up happily at the bright blue sky, smiling happily to know that this is the future of technology

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    These fucking televisions have less ram than my fucking 8 year old phone

    At some point it’s just better to factory reset this bitch and paste an RPI in the back with my own android TV so it can actually run with 8gb ram 256gb space

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The smart ones are sold at cost or at a loss, and your privacy is then sold to subsidize the profits. A dumb tv costs more money up front (since it’s not subsidized by your privacy), but it costs far less in overall value. It’s a tradeoff that the consumer needs to make. The lovely thing, is that (for now, at least) it is still a choice we can make.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Not all tvs allow you to do that. Some require you to be online. Some took it a step further and are equipped with 4/5G modems to bypass your network restrictions.

            • oatscoop@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              A set of torx screwdrivers and an exacto knife will take care of that. Pretty hard for a cellular modem to transmit data when the traces to the antenna are cut.

            • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Some require you to be online.

              I’d take it back to the store as broken. Never heard of that though.

              Some took it a step further and are equipped with 4/5G modems to bypass your network restrictions.

              Never heard of this either and it would raise a massive stink in the EU. Can you share an example?

              • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Both of these were in the USA. The first was with a friend’s purchase, the latter was an article he sent me. It’s been a little while, but I know one was Samsung, but can’t remember the other brand or which was which.

                • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I wouldn’t put it past Samsung to try and force you to have internet access enabled so they can spy on you.

                  However having additional hardware to directly access the internet via cellular is a bit much. That might have been an Aprils fools article by some IT site.

                  When Sony tried to install root kits on PCs of folks just trying to watch a movie on a legit purchased DVD there was a quite large shitstorm.

        • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Which is an entirely fair compromise for people who use Lemmy, but means precisely nothing to the majority.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Well that’s not true. They have been in business for 40 years. They sell TVs for people who don’t want anything except video in. Mainly commercial places like offices, stadiums, etc.

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Keep in mind that these are low-end TVs with, according to reviewers, generally subpar picture and sound quality, with quality issues that make them worse to look at than even old TVs. If you just need “a TV” and your only concerns are that the device is flat, the image in color and some sort of noise is escaping the speaker holes, they’ll do, but don’t expect anything more than that. To me at least, it makes more sense to not connect a smart TV to the network and use a separate streaming device attached to it.

        I would even buy a slightly older used dumb TV from a reputable manufacturer over one of these sketchy things, since it’s not like LCD TVs are finicky technology - they tend to last for an incredibly long time in my experience, easily 15 years or more. On my parents’ 2008ish Toshiba (1080p and every analog and digital input in the known universe, which, in combination with an excellent analog upscaler, makes it awesome for old games consoles - but it’s of course no looker in terms of colors by modern standards), the only thing that has broken so far is the spring of the power button, so I bent a wire press it in and a switch at the plug to be able to turn it off completely.

        This is getting a bit off-topic, but a relative of mine replaced her flatscreen TV from 2002 (!) just two years ago - and it was still working fine, but since it only had an analog tuner and SD resolution, she was looking for an upgrade. I got her a small 4K OLED from Samsung (since discontinued) and she’s very happy with it (even the “smart” features are quite inoffensive), although I did have to get her a soundbar as well, because if there’s one thing that has regressed on TVs, it’s sound quality, in part due to how ever thinner and lighter designs have reduced speakers to little more than phone speakers on some devices.

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        either

        Is there any indication that they won’t implement this shit at some point?

        Also, should we be trying to come up with the most insane “features” in this vein that we can imagine (knowing full well that some corporation will come up with them eventually), and then patent them to protect humanity from them?

        Is there any organization that collects patents just to block them (in the consumer’s favor)? A kind of white-hat patent troll? And, if not, should we create one?

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember the ancient times when you could buy something, turn it on, then have it do what you want it to do. Setting the clock was the difficult part. Other than that, it just worked.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      Learning ESPHome has been the most liberating thing. Take back control of your home. Local first. Privacy respecting.

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I spy a research rabbit hole in my near future … 🐰

        Edit: ESPHome is a system to control your microcontrollers by simple yet powerful configuration files and control them remotely through Home Automation systems.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Esphome is limiting though. Want to have a sensor that spawns a camera stream only on PIR detection, and then sleeps? Forget about it, those two will run in parallel, and the debug messages are terrible.

        I find it more liberating to write in C, and then setup my own mqtt protocols when I want for HA to interact with

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree. A few years ago I wanted to activate a fan based on temperature in a server cabinet, and offer a REST and MQTT APIs (for HA). It was impossible with ESP Home for some reason, if you added the Bosch 280 sensor you couldn’t use MQTT. Very arbitrary limitations.

          It took me less than 2 hours to build it with an ESP32 + Arduino. It’s all libraries that you just need to put together at this point, barely any logic at all.

    • wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Get in car after SO used it. Her BT connects. She goes into BT settings and disconnects. The phone auto reconnects. She turns BT off. The phone turns it back on. She is stuck in a loop. I can never connect phone ever again.

      Technology is amazing.

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Generally it’s not too hard to disable the smart TV part of it and just use HDMI for TVs running Android. But on Roku TVs for whatever reason you need to connect them to the internet and a Roku account at least once to unlock the picture settings. Hardware features of a TV like brightness adjustment have no business relying on some random server.

  • tree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wish there was a company like Fairphone or Framework laptops but for TVs.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        These don’t seem to be particularly new panels. $600 and only 97% of the sRGB color space (= ~78% DCI-P3), meanwhile a similarly priced LG “QNED” can do 90-95% of DCI-P3. I’m not sure you can even call those TVs HDR if they’re only 8-bit color. None of these models can even remotely compare to a brand new OLED TV.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      LCD panels do exist. They are just very expensive because they are not made for consumers and have no ads or data collection.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Tbh I bought my last tv when 1080p lcd was the hot new thing and it was NOT cheap. If buying a dumb tv/“display” is just the same thing I’m used to? Fine.

          That lcd is still kicking though so I won’t find out until it’s dead.

  • Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I have a Samsung smart TV and the operating system on it is so annoying. It’s so slow, has dumb ads, and I can’t cast to it like at all.

    I’m even more pissed that they just disabled the Steam Link app for essentially no reason; it worked great for streaming games from my PC.

    I’ve been thinking it would be cool to flash a different OS onto it, but I’m not sure if that’s actually possible.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was dumb enough to get a random Samsung phone for a while. The ROM was on the SoC so it wasn’t possible to change short of getting out an atomic force microscope.

      Sounds like smart TVs usually have older hardware, though, which could actually be a saving grace.

    • RxBrad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Rented a house over the holidays that had a Samsung Smart TV.

      The UI is mind-bogglingly bad and slow.

      The remote is also absolutely terrible and unintuitive. The keys that feel like they should be the arrow keys… aren’t. So even simple navigation through menus is painful.

  • seemefeelme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    I never understood why people hated smart TVs until one day mine decided to install an update that presents me with advertisements and a hub screen when I turn it on. If I don’t select something in time, the screen disappears, which locks all of the controls, and I can only reset it by turning it off and on again. Why??? Just why?!?!

  • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is why I am dreading when my 2017 dumb TV dies. It’s really telling that dumb TVs, which should be cheaper to produce and sell, are either not available or very expensive (as in commercial displays). Really proves the point that the consumer is really the product.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Projectors come with their own set of issues, but at least you can still get a really good one without all the “smart” features.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Don’t worry, silicon valley is already making headway into government (where all the big guns and the monopoly on force is).

    • Pechente@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can you give a recommendation? I too looked for big displays and found commercial ones to be used as digital billboards but the specs weren’t all that good (no oled, no hdr).

    • renard_roux@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      We have a Samsung “smart” TV, hooked up to an AppleTV box. The TV’s original remote is in a drawer somewhere, forever unused.

      I have the apps that I need, the tiny Siri Remote turns on the TV and handles volume, and, apart from the aggressively, insanely, mind-blowingly horrible on-screen “keyboard” / text input (we don’t have Apple phones we can use to mitigate this, sadly. Also, what the fucking fuck, Apple?!) we’re happy. For now. I trust Apple to make the experience incrementally worse as a fact of life.

      Not perfect, but leagues better than dealing with Samsung’s interface.

  • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m in the market for a new tv and all this crap just makes me want to scream in frustration. But prolonging the decision will just make it even worse.

    On top of that my 2017 shield is starting to show its age and there is really no comparable 4k (streaming) alternative thats not a security risk. I feel more and more pushed towards piracy, so that I can use my linux box and decide how and where to watch content. I hate it…

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      smart TVs mostly can be used as a dumb TV if you reject the terms of services when you set it up. I understand they are annoying, but people making such a big fuzz about them are clearly just fabricating drama.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t even have to reject the terms of services, just never connect it to the internet. Not even once.

        Won’t even be able to send rejections to a server.

        I can recommend TLC, they can be used as a dumb TV and never need an internet connection if you just use it as a screen. Wouldn’t recommend them with internet though since the remote literally has a microphone build-in.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          But I want to use the Internet. I want it to be able to access my network files and to cast video from my phone. Why does it have to be either all or nothing?

          • DdCno1@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Consider an Android TV device. Fire TV Stick at the low end, Shield TV Pro at the high end. Not much point to anything in between.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            And the next generation my well have capability to connect to cell towers or something (for your convenience!). Or just refuse to work without internet access (for security!).

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Interesting. I wonder how long that will last.

        You really think the technology being inside there and capable of switching on at any time is just drama?

      • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think it is a drama, because it’s not just the tvs doing that. Almost everything is getting more and more annoying and restricting. Things are starting to constantly nag you one way or another, shove things into your face you don’t care about, take away functionality and generally worsen user experience… It’s just mentally exhausting.

        And yes I know you can reliably turn that data collection stuff off (at least in the EU) but hopping through those hoops each and every time for each and every device and service can and will hollow out your resolve (and you have to find all the buried options every time…). Thats how you get masses that just don’t care anymore.

        • sanzky@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I honestly think the issue is that these people want a SmartTV but are annoyed about its downsides. When I bought my current TV I disabled the smartOS but ended up enabling it back because I did find value on its features.

          I think the complaints are not well articulated. They do want the smart TV they just want good ones that dont spy on them or show ads.

    • Bad_Company_Daps@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Found any promising leads? My Samsung is still holding on but I know I’m counting the days until it’s time to replace it

      • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m still agonizing over it. However, I stopped caring as much and decided to focus on picture and capabilities. I’ll use it as dumb tv and try to beat whatever streamer will follow my shield into submission. Saves me getting a new dac for my hifi as well as none of my possible choices seem to support usb audio passthrough.

        My biggest problem right now is that I always end up in the premium oled section ;)

  • Skunk@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ah! I was reading that post yesterday https://lemmy.world/post/22309068 as I am looking for a 55’ 4K oled dumb display.

    So far no joy.

    Apparently some manufacturers makes internet mandatory at first boot and even if you block or disconnect it later it will nag you for firmware update every now and then.

    The only possibility I have found for an EU customer at the moment is Sony Bravia. Yup Sony sucks but apparently Bravia’s let you choose to refuse the terms of service and not use the smart things, thus making them dumb tv.

    But maybe I’m wrong, maybe it’s not the case anymore or maybe they will decide to change that.

    That sucks, if any of you knows about a commercial display/computer monitor/dumb tv in oled 4K hdr 55’ available in Europe, I might fall a little bit in love with you.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      AFAIK, LG still do not require internet access on first startup.
      At least on their medium/high end lines (C and G series).
      This was a hard requirement for me. Mine has never been on the internet.

      • Skunk@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s good to know, thanks.

        But after my message this morning I decided to try out my xgimi projector in the living room instead of the bedroom.

        It is perfect like that and I will give the tv (old LG 1080p). A bedroom is not a home cinema anyway, because you don’t want crumbs in the bed 🙄

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I love having a projector in the living room.
          I won’t lie, it gets used far less than I’d like.
          But it cost me almost nothing, and it’s just fun to have a massive wall of video.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m sure they exist (though at what price point?) but I have a hard time imagining a projector (and a surface to project on), that can reach anything close to the black levels of a modern OLED panel.

            Again, I’m sure they exist, but at comparable prices?

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s a room treatment issue. You need to control light and reflections, because your “black” is just however dark the projector screen is.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Is that true? Because I was under the impression that even the darkest “blacks” from a projector, are still made from the light coming from the device. Which is not necessarily the same thing as a pixel on an OLED TV being set to “off”.

                But I am far from an expert. Also, as I said, I’m sure some really amazing projectors are out there, I just imagine they’re cost prohibitive for most people.

                • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Is that true? Because I was under the impression that even the darkest “blacks” from a projector, are still made from the light coming from the device

                  You’re probably thinking of contrast, which is the ability of the projector to avoid bleeding light into areas that shouldn’t have any. But as far as the darkness of the black levels, that’s down to room treatment (and the screen surface, to a lesser extent). After all, a projector emits light, and darkness is simply the absence of light. You can’t “make” darkness, you can only remove light.

    • Pechente@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I recently got the Bravia XR-55A95L probably going through the same thought process as you. You can indeed just skip all the TOS and set it up as a Basic TV.

      However: The software is crap. Complete garbage. Random reboots - I already had to reset it once completely because it no longer showed a picture (and then set it up again). Every day it will show you a notification that it’s not connected to the internet DESPITE having networking disabled completely.

      I tried to update the TV from USB and it failed every time. I eventually gave in and connected it to the internet to update it only to see that I‘m already on the newest version (which I assume is also why updating from USB failed with a generic error).

      I never had this much trouble with a device that costs as much as a MacBook or a high end gaming PC and I would’ve already returned if the competition wasn’t even worse.

      • Skunk@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ah shit.

        Thanks for the feedback, it is greatly appreciated as those things are expensive.

        I guess we are fucked until the EU make a new pro-consumer law. But that would take years (if they ever make it).

        Another possibility would be to use a projector (it is only for homelab NAS movies afterall). I have a xgimi in my bedroom and it is somewhat great once connected to the free AppleTV my ISP gave me. Otherwise the default google tv OS on it is pure shit.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The competition doesn’t sound worse to me. My smart tv from 2019 is rock solid.

        Sony is just known for amazing picture quality and abysmal software, so that’s just par for the course. If you want a stable TV return it and get some of the other models using the same panel (IIRC a QD OLED from Samsung Display).

    • Icarus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I recently got a TCL TV that has Google TV on it. The reason I chose it, even tho it’s not the highest quality 4K capable TV, is that on first boot it gives you the option to choose dumb TV or smart TV modes. Have never connected it to the internet. Maybe you would have some luck looking into that!

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I also recently got a tcl with google, and haven’t hooked it to the internet.

        The OS on it isn’t very good (seriously too many menus in too many places), it sets full brightness and then reduces to setpoint when you change inputs, and I haven’t figured out why it boots up my ps4 every time I turn on the tv, but beyond that I’ve been pretty happy with it.

        It’s a very decent dumb tv.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Same. TCL is pretty good at being a dumb TV.

          Wouldn’t trust it if it is connected to the internet though.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Does Sony suck? I mean, their “SmartTV” software is garbage, but so is every other brand.

      The picture on my Sony Bravia OLED is better than anything I’ve seen, including relatives’ LG OLED panels.

      But yeah, the software side is trash.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m actually quite happy with mine I don’t think it’s shown me a single ad, the only nuisance is it doesn’t stay connected to my WiFi and only joins when I launch an app or something.

    Its a Toshiba with Vidaa Os I think, not saying it’s perfect it has all the UK channel apps but not Stremio which I would like it to have.

    That said it hasn’t done a single thing ad wise to annoy me unlike my firetv cube.

  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sounds like an obvious spot in the market for a bullshit-free smart TV. You’d just have to get the UX right.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, it’s bound to happen eventually, although they’ll probably never be exactly as good or cheap as the ones for the sucker mass-market. Think Fairphone.

      In the meanwhile, we just have to keep kludging in old solutions or alternate solutions, like a monitor. Or you could personally launch an enterprise if you’re so positioned, I guess.

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I’m surprised I’ve yet to hear of a homebrew industry of completely cutting out the microcontrollers and soldering in a Pi or something to drive the raw display. I don’t predict it to be easy, but it doesn’t seem completely unobtainable?

        Flashing a custom bootloader would be even better, but I assume that hasn’t been done because they got that shit cryptographically locked down at the chip level.