Exactly. Block and move on. Don’t twist yourself into knots appeasing people, focus on keeping the users you want happy.
/r/StarTrek founder and primary steward from 2008-2021
Currently on the board of directors for StarTrek.website
Exactly. Block and move on. Don’t twist yourself into knots appeasing people, focus on keeping the users you want happy.
Not trying to victim blame or anything, but I find it hard to believe that someone operating a low-moderation instance would truly expect people who don’t like moderation to stay away.
Don’t get me wrong I agree with your sentiment and dislike that behavior, but what I’m saying is that asking or expecting users not to go on witch hunts or to behave in a certain way is a fool’s errand that will always lead to burnout. A more sustainable approach for admins and mods is creating space for what they want to host and not trying to control what they don’t.
In the article they quoted the moderator (emphasis mine):
“This whole topic is so sad. It’s unfortunate how many mentally unwell people are attracted to the topic of AI. I can see it getting worse before it gets better. I’ve seen sooo many posts where people link to their github which is pages of rambling pre prompt nonsense that makes their LLM behave like it’s a god or something,” the r/accelerate moderator wrote. “Our policy is to quietly ban those users and not engage with them, because we’re not qualified and it never goes well. They also tend to be a lot more irate and angry about their bans because they don’t understand it.”
It seems pretty clear to me that they view it as a problem. Why ban something if they don’t see it as a problem?
Absolutely. And to be clear, the “researcher” being quoted is just a guy on the internet who self-published an official looking “paper”.
That said- I think that’s partly why it’s so interesting that this particular group of people identified the problem, because this group of people are pretty extreme LLM devotees and already ascribe unrealistic traits to LLMs. So if they are noticing people “taking it too seriously” then you know it must be bad.
Yeeeeah that user doesn’t really understand how these things work. Hopefully stories like this can get out there because the only thing that can stop predatory behavior by corporations is bad press.
What is that from? I didn’t see it in the article.
It seemed fine to me…
…oh my
Honestly I’m just glad someone is out there doing this work
Heck yeah! Love when people share this kind of stuff.
I’m pretty sure baldness is not a medical condition…
I will be dead in the cold cold ground before I ever type “/s”
I know it sounds insane but I swear to god BlueSky has astroturfing accounts on Lemmy. Every conversation (including yours here) about BlueSky is met with countless Sealions either saying it “will be federated soon” or asking “Why does federation matter?”
This is very cool! Thanks for sharing.
Everything now is rage-bait designed to get more clicks
IMO the greatest strength of the Fediverse is the increased number of mods and admins looking at everything. Don’t want rage bait? Join an instance that has rules against it.
Additional PSA to admins not running a “universal free speech” instance- if you see someone someone being obnoxious it’s probably annoying your users just as much as is is you. Don’t put the onus fully on users to curate their experience. The Fediverse needs our adults in the room!
Always wanted one of those!
This is an excellent thing to wear in public and wait for other Trekkies to notice.
He’s not really dead. As long as we remember him.