cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327

In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.

The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.

It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance

Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.

You can see for yourself here

Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon

    • spaduf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You really made about 20 comments before doing even a basic amount of due dilligence, huh?

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I apologize, I thought I did, I read the rules, and I read on the frontpage, and it seemed pretty harmless.

        And there were no posts here that showed anything actually wrong, but mostly what seemed like knee jerk reactions to the accusation.

        Had I dug one step deeper, I would have found it. But my diligence wasn’t diligent enough, and I wrongfully concluded it was an anti LGBT issue.

        Turns out I was mistaken, and yes I was a bit slow to figure that out.

      • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He even reported people lol

        We were about to ban him for being a pedo apologist because of it. Luckily we did look a little deeper and saw that he had a realisation ;)