• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you really don’t believe that these are people that did something wrong, that they should be shunned for the rest of their days by every living being, where’s the virtue in even keeping a felon alive? Why don’t we just have a door to a firepit in every jury courtroom that opens upon a guilty Verdict? Why pretend to weigh punishment with mercy, but still set them up for failure in every possible way?

    Honest question, do we want to be a benevolent society that sees a fallen member, and wants to help them reintegrate after their just punishment, or is mercy as a positive thing in our society as stone dead a concept as greed being a negative thing?

    • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ignoring the “Haven’t we already been hard enough on the rapist?” Choice:

      I firmly believe in rehabilitation and am opposed to the death penalty for all but the most heinous of crimes.

      But there has been no rehabilitation. This is someone who has spent the better part of two decades silencing his victims and running from his crime. And to come out and say “He deserves leniency” is REAL fucking stupid and, quite frankly, completely undermines any attempt to be seen as “one of the good ones” with respect to a sex abuse organization (and let’s not get into how said org mostly exists to hunt and punish sex workers).