• TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    74
    ·
    3 months ago

    If we can’t have a fact based conversation about anything then I don’t know what the point is. As a leftie this type of rhetoric really saddens me. I thought we were better than the Maga crowd.

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nobody wants to have a conversation with you. It was just a check if people like you are still around. You confirmed. No more conversation is needed. Nobody is required to waste their breath on you.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        55
        ·
        3 months ago

        Then don’t position yourself as above the Maga crowd. You are all the same.

        • Pilon23@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s mostly just this place. You find this tribalist response on a lot of topics here. Other instances aren’t as cultish. Good on you for arguing your case, but it falls on deaf ears. The discourse could use some improvements

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thanks. I have to adopt a different strategy. I even asked the people I was “debating” for advice on what I’m doing wrong and they still found reason to put me down. It could be the tone that’s inferred in written communication. I have no idea.

            • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Your original comment is passive-aggressive. You decry that people aren’t doing their due dilligence but don’t actually provide your perspective on the story or give any indication that you’ve put in any effort of your own. Unless you believe that legal definitions and jury trials are simply right, in which case, wow, you’re such a leftist.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                It depends. Some people have a hard time with it. I’ve met a few that always read the worst interpretation. It’s true though, there is no prosody in text (at least not the same as in spoken).

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        I voted for Bernie in the 'primary, I voted for Biden and I’m voting for Kamala. Trump is a piece of shit insurrectionist that should not be on the ballot.

        If every time someone on your side points a criticism you do this game, it’s the exact same thing the Maga crowd does with labeling anti - trump Republicans as RINOS.

        If all you care about is labels and how fast you can pin someone in a box so you don’t have to engage with a conversation that says more about you.

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          People have engaged with your comments. The ardent defense of Rittenhouse does not match with progressivism.

          Especially in context of Rittenhouse becoming a right wing hero and not regretting his actions.

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is another weird thing. Because I’m interested in the facts of the matter people assume by default that I’m interested in defending Kyle. I don’t care for Kyle. I think hes a pos. But this weird response is always like the top comment I get. You’re not A so you must be B. So we can’t talk about the facts of something without the need to box someone in.

            • x4740N@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Just stop, you sound like a centrist who’s trying to sound intellectual when they are not

        • Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m quoting you here:

          “As a European that lived in America briefly (ten years) I was very shocked when I encountered the gun culture there.”

          “I voted for Bernie in the 'primary, I voted for Biden and I’m voting for Kamala. Trump is a piece of shit insurrectionist that should not be on the ballot.“

          How are these two things possible without you being a liar?

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            What part is hard to believe exactly? I moved to the US in 2012 from Italy. I lived there for ten years. While I was there the gun culture was something I never really got accustomed to. What part of this makes me a liar? I’m so confused.

            Edit:

            Guys. I have dual citizenship. My mother is a US expat. I can vote in both Italian and US elections.

        • ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          If every time someone on your side

          Not “our” side…? You’re slipping, kid. Thought you was moar lefty than all the rest of us combined.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I have you tagged as [Conservative] so I don’t mistake you for someone worth having a discussion with.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        So as a person on the left I cannot fact check anything that gets repeated on our side? I don’t understand this need to silence people so hard because they asked a question or have a disagreement with a position. It’s truly bizarre. If it makes you feel better to label me something and that’s the best you can do, go ahead.

    • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Facts are important, but it’s not possible to come with only the ones you prefer. You need to make room for more.

      • He obtained firearms illegally, from people who encouraged him to take violent action throughout his upbringing.
      • He didn’t believe he was acting valorous, he thought he was going to get to shoot people.
      • It turned out very different than he expected and he did what he was conditioned to do, it was murder and it was in self defense. It was very sad.
      • He’s since gone on to gloat about it and threaten to do stuff like that again.

      That people are looking at all this and thinking it seems like premeditated murder that turned into a panicked self defense (except with a literal killing weapon on hand, which he brought!) is perfectly reasonable.

      To be honest, debating it feels gross. It seems more sensible to just recognize that it makes sense people would feel this way, and move on. Regardless of what the courts say, this conclusion makes total sense.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you want to have a fact based conversation, it would be nice if you came with facts instead of just claiming they exist.

      If you want to discuss about what kind of killing is worth calling murder, it would be nice if you explained your position.

      Your original comment is incredibly passive-aggressive.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks. I want to get better so if the way I replied came across as passive aggressive then it’s something I need to work on.

        I’ve tried having a factual discussion on this instance about the topic in the past but I ended up spending the whole time arguing if I’m a conservative in disguise or not and honestly that’s the most I can get out of this platform. If you have any tips on a better approach I’m all ears. I really want to get my messaging to a better place.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I guess the main thing is that if you’re going to argue for something very unpopular, rather than arguing for the sake of your opponent as they are today, argue for the sake of uncommitted onlookers and for the sake of the opponent a week from now after they’ve had time to calm down and reprocess. Respond to their arguments, of course, but do it in a way that illustrates to less polarized people that you’ve got a point, rather than trying to convince your opponent or finding specific errors in the opponent’s reasoning/self-justification.

          When an issue is as polarized as this, people very rarely switch sides publicly (unless they’re shilling and they didn’t hold the original position to begin with), but people can cringe from the side making bad arguments, quietly distancing themselves, and a few months or years later show up on a different side.

          If you want that side to be your side, it’s nice to present a pipeline that does that. People who cringe from bottom-of-the-barrel leftist discourse can fall into alt-right pipelines, which you presumably don’t want, so ideally you would want to have examples of (leftist) influencers whose takes you find reasonable, ideally on the case itself. For example, LegalEagle (“it is plausible that the jury was right that murder under Wisconsin law was not proven beyond reasonable doubt”).

          The hate is not really avoidable except by forgoing this venue or not arguing your point, but like with the hate thrown towards peaceful climate activists, it is not a sign that you’re doing a bad job.

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Thank you. I appreciate the thoughts. I understand the onlooker angle Vs trying to convince your opponent. There’s a lot to mull over in your comment. Going to process and reflect. Thanks again.