• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    And yet I can speak about my consciousness, and therefore deliver information to you based on an experience which can’t be physically observed or quantified.

    Perhaps the universe is naught but a comforting illusion.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      deliver information to you based on an experience which can’t be physically observed or quantified

      I’m not sure if “Black Box of electro-chemistry” is necessarily the same as “Non-determinism”.

      That said, we contain the ability to observe and react to our surroundings which causes a large and complex web of interactions that aren’t trivial to map or anticipate.

      That unpredictablity is what we ultimately define as freedom.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I was curious if anyone would catch that. My comment doesn’t necessarily ensure free will, it just rejects a physicalist model of reality as a basis for determinism. You can have neutral monism and still have determinism.

        I was just trying to embrace the spirit of shitposting idealist takes in response to shitty physicalist takes. 🤭

        • WldFyre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Neutral monism just looks like “we have to have souls because the science is uncomfortable to me” but for atheists lol

      • brrt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That said, we contain the ability to observe and react to our surroundings which causes a large and complex web of interactions that aren’t trivial to map or anticipate.

        That unpredictablity is what we ultimately define as freedom.

        How does higher uncertainty of my choices achieving what I strive for raise the perception of freedom of said choice?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          higher uncertainty of my choices achieving what I strive for

          More higher uncertainty of an outside observer predicting the choices you will make.

          The inability to anticipate another person’s actions suggests they may have internal agency. Compared to say, a rock, which you can shove and confidently predict where it will stop moving, a human is far more difficult to judge.

          • brrt@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t understand what you are getting at. You are either saying that you can predict where a fly is going to go when you set it free or you are saying that a fly has internal agency.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You are either saying that you can predict where a fly is going to go when you set it free or you are saying that a fly has internal agency.

              If the fly lacks agency, you would be able to predict its movement given a sufficiently accurate set of information.

              If it has agency, you could not.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                It’s difficult to predict the path of a leaf floating in the wind, but I don’t think anybody would say a leaf has agency.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It’s difficult to predict the path of a leaf floating in the wind

                  Orders of magnitude less difficult, as the leaf can’t glean your intent and respond accordingly.

              • brrt@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You missed the point while drawing your circular argument.

                Take what you said and replace fly with human. Wait here I’ll do it for you:

                If a human lacks agency, you would be able to predict its movement given a sufficiently accurate set of information.

                If it has agency, you could not.

                Now tell me how you will acquire a sufficiently accurate set of information about a human and its environment to test your hypothesis.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Now tell me how you will acquire a sufficiently accurate set of information about a human and its environment to test your hypothesis.

                  You can’t. That’s a significant problem of identifying the existence or absence of “Free Will”.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      ChatGPT can speak about its consciousness too, but there’s no reason to believe it actually is conscious. It’s just very good at writing text that imitates text written by beings that believe they’re conscious. It’s difficult to understand how ChatGPT generates that text. But, if anybody were sufficiently interested, it would be possible to trace the entire process, since it’s just computers processing data.

      Also, MRIs can observe the brain as it does things. Currently it’s a pretty blunt tool and can only guess at what someone is thinking, but there’s no reason to assume that a much more advanced version won’t be capable of observing and quantifying the actions of every neuron in real time.