• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    higher uncertainty of my choices achieving what I strive for

    More higher uncertainty of an outside observer predicting the choices you will make.

    The inability to anticipate another person’s actions suggests they may have internal agency. Compared to say, a rock, which you can shove and confidently predict where it will stop moving, a human is far more difficult to judge.

    • brrt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t understand what you are getting at. You are either saying that you can predict where a fly is going to go when you set it free or you are saying that a fly has internal agency.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You are either saying that you can predict where a fly is going to go when you set it free or you are saying that a fly has internal agency.

        If the fly lacks agency, you would be able to predict its movement given a sufficiently accurate set of information.

        If it has agency, you could not.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s difficult to predict the path of a leaf floating in the wind, but I don’t think anybody would say a leaf has agency.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s difficult to predict the path of a leaf floating in the wind

            Orders of magnitude less difficult, as the leaf can’t glean your intent and respond accordingly.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                That the movement of a leaf in the wind is less complex than the electro-chemical processes of a human brain?

                With enough time and math, certainly.

                • merc@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The point is, you were using the point that a fly’s movements were complex to argue that a fly has internal agency. But, a leaf floating on the wind also has complex movements. To me, that makes it seem like complex movements aren’t a solid indicator of agency.

                  If you’re now talking about dissection, that’s a whole different argument.

                  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    a fly’s movements were complex to argue that a fly has internal agency

                    A fly has the ability to observe its surroundings and adjust its position in response to outside stimulus. A leaf does not. That, alone, adds a dimension of activity that the first possesses and the second doesn’t.

                    You can argue that the fly is still a deterministic agent, but the ability to observe and respond adds a dimension of activity that’s more complex than a leaf, which can only move based on the surrounding wind currents.

        • brrt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You missed the point while drawing your circular argument.

          Take what you said and replace fly with human. Wait here I’ll do it for you:

          If a human lacks agency, you would be able to predict its movement given a sufficiently accurate set of information.

          If it has agency, you could not.

          Now tell me how you will acquire a sufficiently accurate set of information about a human and its environment to test your hypothesis.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Now tell me how you will acquire a sufficiently accurate set of information about a human and its environment to test your hypothesis.

            You can’t. That’s a significant problem of identifying the existence or absence of “Free Will”.