• FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    It may be my ignorance, but the history of the USA i know starts with the massacre of indigenous people, then goes to the massacre of black people, then the massacre of mexicans, the massacre of communists, then the massacre of vietnamese ppl, then iraqs and afhgans, and so on. Where is the part that inspires the idea that the USA has such great values?

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You left out a bit. We also fought the British, and the Confederacy, and the Spanish, and the Kaiser, and the Nazis, and Imperial Japan.

      America’s history is complicated, and full of atrocities, like the history of nearly every major nation.

      The values he’s referring to in the comic are the core principles espoused in the founding documents. The idea of one nation with liberty and justice for all. At no point in history have those ideas been fully realized, but striving to meet those ideals is what America means to the Captain, not some borders on a map or colors on a flag.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      But they were founded on the idea of the liberty of men… as long as they are white, protestant, male land-owners…

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You are correct, actually. Not sure why you are downvoted. Several traditional tribal government structures of indigenous peoples were much more democratic in form.

            However, besides the Iroquois Confederacy, it’s hard to consider them as being sufficiently organised to be considered a state in the traditional sense. This isn’t meant to exclude all indigenous governments; the Aztec, Mayan, and Inca civilisations were all examples of (non-democratic) highly organised states, especially in comparison to the North American tribes around and after European contact.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              I don’t think that being/having a state is necessary for a democratich governance. I don’t know why you added that conditional.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                It is not, but I think that discussion about democracy in cultures that don’t organise themselves into states is very informative because those societies basically have to be democratic. A state apparatus that can enforce its will is what allows a state to be non-democratic in the first place. If there is no state, people who don’t like it can just leave.

                • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I kind of get your point. However, the state, as we knou it today is a relatively new invention. And the original idea of the post was that the US was founded on “enlightenment ideas”, like democracy and such. This framing is very cynical, since the european upper class probably got those concepts from the native Americans which the US displaced/genocided.

                  Also: I’m an anarchist, so I’ll guess you’ll forgive that I’m not too fond of states. ;)

                  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    “enlightenment ideas”, like democracy and such. This framing is very cynical, since the european upper class probably got those concepts from the native Americans which the US displaced/genocided.

                    What an absolutely bizarre idea.

                  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I disagree vehemently with the assertion that the state is a modern invention. Humans have organised themselves into states for the vast majority of human history. The earliest examples of writing were state records. In fact, to my knowledge, there are no ancient civilisations who (1) have developed writing and (2) did not organise themselves into states. Ancient Egypt, Sumner and Mesopotamia, Ancient China—all of the earliest known civilisations in recorded history—had states, the basic function of which has remained unchanged throughout history. They had rulers or bodies that created laws, collected taxes, raised armies to maintain their power and fight other states, and enforced their laws on their subjects.

                    While the Great Law of Peace of the Iroquois Confederacy was certainly known to the writers of the US Constitution, we know for a fact what their inspirations were, without needing to speculate, because they produced a large body of essays defending and explaining their reasoning. These are the Federalist Papers. You may have heard of them. We know that the writers draw inspiration from primarily European sources, such as the English Bill of Rights, the operation of the Roman Republic and of Athenian democracy, and of documents like the Magna Carta.