• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    But they were founded on the idea of the liberty of men… as long as they are white, protestant, male land-owners…

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You are correct, actually. Not sure why you are downvoted. Several traditional tribal government structures of indigenous peoples were much more democratic in form.

          However, besides the Iroquois Confederacy, it’s hard to consider them as being sufficiently organised to be considered a state in the traditional sense. This isn’t meant to exclude all indigenous governments; the Aztec, Mayan, and Inca civilisations were all examples of (non-democratic) highly organised states, especially in comparison to the North American tribes around and after European contact.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think that being/having a state is necessary for a democratich governance. I don’t know why you added that conditional.

            • NateNate60@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              It is not, but I think that discussion about democracy in cultures that don’t organise themselves into states is very informative because those societies basically have to be democratic. A state apparatus that can enforce its will is what allows a state to be non-democratic in the first place. If there is no state, people who don’t like it can just leave.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                I kind of get your point. However, the state, as we knou it today is a relatively new invention. And the original idea of the post was that the US was founded on “enlightenment ideas”, like democracy and such. This framing is very cynical, since the european upper class probably got those concepts from the native Americans which the US displaced/genocided.

                Also: I’m an anarchist, so I’ll guess you’ll forgive that I’m not too fond of states. ;)

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  “enlightenment ideas”, like democracy and such. This framing is very cynical, since the european upper class probably got those concepts from the native Americans which the US displaced/genocided.

                  What an absolutely bizarre idea.

                • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I disagree vehemently with the assertion that the state is a modern invention. Humans have organised themselves into states for the vast majority of human history. The earliest examples of writing were state records. In fact, to my knowledge, there are no ancient civilisations who (1) have developed writing and (2) did not organise themselves into states. Ancient Egypt, Sumner and Mesopotamia, Ancient China—all of the earliest known civilisations in recorded history—had states, the basic function of which has remained unchanged throughout history. They had rulers or bodies that created laws, collected taxes, raised armies to maintain their power and fight other states, and enforced their laws on their subjects.

                  While the Great Law of Peace of the Iroquois Confederacy was certainly known to the writers of the US Constitution, we know for a fact what their inspirations were, without needing to speculate, because they produced a large body of essays defending and explaining their reasoning. These are the Federalist Papers. You may have heard of them. We know that the writers draw inspiration from primarily European sources, such as the English Bill of Rights, the operation of the Roman Republic and of Athenian democracy, and of documents like the Magna Carta.

                  • Tiempo@ttrpg.network
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I’m sorry, but you are mixing state with form of government. The state was born as a concept with westafalia accord, not before that. And that is very very new