- Competition is still not the optimal strategy.
- The biological world still isn’t fundamentally based on competition.
- “Domination” for animals is something fundamentally different than the domination of command and control that humans carry out.
But this predates humans.
That’s not true. The biological world isn’t fundamentally based on competition.
Competition inside one species actually is decremental to their survival. The optimal strategy for members of a species is cooperation, especially when that reduces scarcity.
Edit: I forgot to mention that you’re also committing the naturalistic fallacy.
It’s also a society where the basic form of material interaction is competition.
This is a meme, homie.
Same in German (that’s the joke ;)
without a deciding organ
Lol, wut? xD
As I said: stop. You’ve made it clear enough that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Ah yes. The people who literally advocate for consensus-based decision making don’t want to reach agreements. /s
Seriously: You should stop trying to be smug about stuff you don’t have the slightest idea about. You’re jpst embarassing yourselft.
Who’s talking about elections? Ever heard of an anarchist partaking in elections? O.o
Jesse, what the hell are you talking about.jpeg
Dammit, you beat me! :D
I simply care even harder /j
I would like to emphasize the message “RUGS”.
Possibly you just had to hear it more than once.
I learned it the other way around since my physics teacher was speedrunning the math sections to get to the fun physics stuff and I really got it after hearing it the second time in math class.
But yeah: it often helps to have practical examples and it doesn’t get any more applicable to real life than d/dt.
Pokemon Red/Blue reference spotted? ಠ_ಠ
Why does this remind me of a certain golden calf?
I onde read a pluralistic article about this where he linked apaper that the backfiring effect was supposedly a fluke.
Was ich mich eher frage: Wann werfen Bibi &Tina ihre bürgerliche Ideologie endlich ab?
Anon is gay, checks out