• harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    There is no proof outside of the Bible and some other writings. Even those mentions seem to have occurred well after Jesus supposedly lived.

    In terms of non-literary proof, there isn’t anything credible.

    There’s more evidence that King David existed.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Chances are he was more like a cult leader it wasn’t until a decade or two after his death that things really got into full swing, so chances are the actual Jesus would be quite surprised by everything “he” did.

      But there were a lot of Jewish mystics cropping up at the time so it’s not impossible or even implausible for some one vaguely matching the description to have existed.

      • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Exactly. An example from outside the Bible might be Achilles. There was probably a great warrior with that name in the Mycenaean Greek world. Later storytellers probably just added more to make it sound better or the material was from other warriors who were like Achilles.

        Some of Jesus’ teachings definitely come from the milieu of the Roman era in Judea and Palestina.

        Personally my favorite head canon is that Jesus was, or his parents were, Egyptian born Jews or Coptic converts to Judaism. It’s a reverse Obamas birth certificate. There is so much time spent establishing the lineage and explaining the flight to Egypt.

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good thing back in the day there were probably very few cult leaders…

        Does anyone wonder about how the story of Jesus being plagiarized from the Egyptian myth of Horus affects the narrative about the Jesus that supposedly lived and died a century earlier? You know the one that happened to have incredibly important political value for the established leaders of the time?

        No? Me either. Praise Horus!

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      You realize that a significant portion of the bible is the collected letters and works that were at the time (that it was assembled) considered credible, right?

      There’s a period of around 80 years that’s pretty hard to account for, but unlike the four gospels where there’s little corroborating evidence that tracks back into that 80 year period, the epistolary works are pretty likely to be authentic. They also reference a bunch of other letters that didn’t survive, something that tends to make them more likely authentic than not. And they involve people who were eyewitnesses of a man named Jesus (or Joshua or Yeshua if you prefer) and his younger (step) brothers.

      The rest of the statements about him were solidified by 80 years or so after his death, but all the accounts don’t quite line up — which is actually a good argument for them being based on actual events.

      So while there may be plenty of room for debate as to how much of the biblical teachings actually originated with a man named Jesus, his actual existence seems more evident than, say, Shakespeare.

      • JesterIzDead@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        The mental gymnastics is palpable. That things don’t line up is evidence they’re true? And because people believed it at the time it must be credible? Did a guy really live in the belly of a whale for three days simply because some simpletons believed it?

        • arefx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Of course not because it’s a load of hogwash. Go play telephone with a class of 6th graders for 5 minutes and then tell me these stories are accurate. Also the events in most of them are clearly impossible situations.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s how epistemological analysis works… if the general structure is the same but everyone pulls different meaning out of an event, something probably happened. If everything lines up exactly, someone probably faked the letters. If there’s totally conflicting stories, the record has been tampered with too much to say anything. If there’s no record, there’s nothing to say one way or another.

          • JesterIzDead@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            I suppose the burden of proof would have to be that low to believe something so ridiculous

      • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Assembled a thousand years after the fact by a group with a vested interest in solidifying the narrative to fit their own.

        Hell, the Tanakh didn’t really get put together until well after Christianity appeared and it was a reaction to Christians appropriating Jewish literary culture to establish their own.

        It’d be similar to people a thousand years from believing that Christian Gray is literally descended from Edward and Bella.