• dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Cool.

    Now take that highly-penetrative AR15 and shoot it into a school building, knowing full well that the bullets will penetrate the walls and kill the people on the other side of the school.

    Even when everyone has an AR15, the shooter still has the advantage, because he had the children hostage. There were also questions on whether the school was clear before any potential shootout (see the problem with AR15’s huge amount of penetration: shooting through the attacker and hitting children in another room is a serious concern still even as SWAT arrives).

    Even when you give everyone the works, the problem at play here was the AR15 in the hands of the shooter, which required the police to take a step back and rework tactics entirely.

    Thinking from the perspective of the cops side will 100% give yall a ton of evidence and logical arguments to fuck up the pro-gun AR15 lobby. Just think damn it.

    • Wilshire@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      .223/5.56 will not penetrate a cinder block wall

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3Gp3hbTmXA

      Among the tactical officers who responded were members of the Border Patrol’s elite Bortac team but they couldn’t get into the room because of a steel door and cinder block construction, The Wall Street Journal

      Also, most cops carry AR15s or a similar rifle in their cop car.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Also, most cops carry AR15s or a similar rifle in their cop car.

        Good job highlighting your ignorance to Uvalde. Did you read the police log yet?

        We have him in the room. He’s got an AR-15. He’s shot a lot … we don’t have firepower right now … It’s all pistols … I don’t have a radio … I need you to bring a radio for me, and give me my radio for me … I need to get one rifle … I’m trying to set him up

        Read the fucking log. Have you read the log yet? What time was this radio message sent?

          • dragontamer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            33
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The original police officers tussled with a shooter with body-armor and superior AR15 firepower until they cornered him. And that wasn’t good enough for yall dumbasses.

            These original officers responding to the call were god damn heroes. And if anyone read the log they’d know.


            Blame SWAT for being shitty and taking their time. But… even then… I have the AR15 penetrating walls / killing other people issue for good guy with gun vs bad guy with gun. I don’t think its very easy or clear to figure out the wall strength, which directions are “safe to shoot at”, etc. etc.

            There’s a lot to think about here, and that’s not even covering the hostages. Just figuring out how to clear the other rooms and making sure enough of the area is clear enough for heavy weaponry is a big enough deal before you send in SWAT and possibly murder some children in the crossfire.


            In any case: my point is clear. The AR15 is the big issue. We seriously should be pushing to ban the AR15 rifle, and any other weapons of similar penetration / muzzle velocity.

          • dragontamer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            27
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I’m not surprised that a rag-tag team of officers without radios was unaware of the firepower on their sides.

            In any case, the officers who were chasing down the shooter with only pistols are heroes. The situation would have been much worse without their action.

            The radio-call I highlighted there is timestamped at 11:40am. Its a real call from the scene. And that’s only 5 minutes after the shooter entered (and was already after the firefights that happened at 11:38 IIRC). In any case, we’re well within the quick action / quick response of the first team, who were largely fighting an uphill battle with pistols, a lack of tactical radios, and other problems.


            This doesn’t change the fact either, that these officers at 11:40 were not a SWAT team. They were just normal officers. Officers don’t get (and shouldn’t get) military style / warrior training.

            And I refuse to give officers more military/warrior training. We already are dealing with an overly militarized police force. I am 100% against any discussion where your conclusion is “Police need bigger guns and need to be meaner”.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      6 months ago

      You have spoken in a clear, concise, and convincing manner. Well done! You’ve swayed this person.

      And you are of course correct in your implication we need to begin design and production of the AR16 posthaste! A gun that shoot through 3 walls is the clear solution. Well done sir!

      But in all seriousness you are correct. A nation littered with mentally unstable morons and high-powered rifles is a potently and predictably tragic way to be.

    • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is outrageous that you are getting downvoted for such a well put together set of comments. Thankyou very much for taking the time. I’m embarrassed for the people who downvote because they know you’re right and they dislike the conclusion.