Not talking about being with one partner at a time. Talking about the idea of finding “the one” and being with them your whole life.

50% divorce rate. 97% of people (in the US) don’t wait till marriage, so most of us have multiple sexual partners prior to the one we stick with. Many have children with more than one partner.

How can anyone look at the world and think, yeah, there’s one that’s meant for everyone and just one?

Also hope I don’t come across disrespectful. If you do believe in monogamy, I am interested in hearing from you. I’m just buzzed and thinking about my own love life and being curt

Edit: Speaking to the idea that it’s the “natural order” or default. Not that it can’t work in individual circumstances, especially when we’ve been programmed for decades

    • DudePluto@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even then it seems illogical to me tbh (internally inconsistent?), but at least it’s less rigid

      • Montagge@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        How so?
        If you date someone in Highschool, and then date someone in college after the highschool relationship ended how are you not monogamous?

        • DudePluto@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh the definition is fine, I just mean that it seems illogical to adhere to it dogmatically.

          Like, ok I’ll try to come up with the best summation but bear with me lol. Basically, let’s say you’re with your current partner. You’ve been into other people in the past. So, logically, you’ll probably be into other people - at some level - in the future, right? That seems like a natural development to me.

          So if it’s natural, why should we have the little fine print on all of our relationships that reads “If you’re into other people this contract is null and void?”

          Am I making sense? Lol. Like I just mean that it’s natural to be attracted, in some way, to more than one person so why do we default to holding ourselves and our partners to the unnatural? In that way, I’m monogamous with one person at a time seems logically inconsistent to me. It accepts the existence of plurality of attraction, yet denies its engagement

          • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            the little fine print on all of our relationships that reads “If you’re into other people this contract is null and void?”

            How do you define “being into them”? Looking and finding them attractive, or fucking them without your partner knowing?

            • DudePluto@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Being into them is being attracted to them which, on an instinctual level, is wanting to fuck them

              Edit: simplified, obviously, you can be attracted to someone in a more emotional way but some would argue that’s still wanting to partner with them in some way

              • SnakeRattleNRoll@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think that’s more of an age thing. Im nearly 40 and in a damn near perfect marriage for 15 years now.

                We have friends that we absolutely find attractive. Frankly speaking, we all take care of ourselves and it shows.

                Im not looking to bang any of them, and my wife isnt either (granted, as she says, but we have a very strong relationship). We’re happy being friends, being comfortable going to the beach, hitting the gym together, etc. We’re all very happy in our monogamous relationships (minus one couple, because he fucked around and is now in the ‘finding out’ stage). Life isnt porn?

                It sounds like you’re more grappling with maturity, and maybe a bit of heartbreak.

              • Rocinante@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m confused. Are you saying people who are monogamous aren’t allowed to be attracted to other people by your definition? Or are you saying why are people choosing to be monogamous over having multiple partners at the same time?

              • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Being into them is being attracted to them which, on an instinctual level, is wanting to fuck them

                So what? As you say, is instinctual. As long as you’re not drooling and you don’t act on it, it’s not a problem. And any person demanding otherwise is toxic and not worthy of your time.

                • DudePluto@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Why are you saying so what? You asked a question and I answered

          • Montagge@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh gotcha! I think a lot of people are too jealous to pull off being poly. It takes a certain mindset to do it in a healthy manner. I guess what my opinion on it is is that there’s nothing bad about it but most people are bad at it.
            I think I would struggle with it because I would feel the need to be there in all ways possible for all partners, but I don’t have the social energy to pull that off.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The divorce rate is not 50%. It’s closer to 30%, 40% at worst.

    Monogamy isn’t equivalent to lifelong partner.

    Aside from which, even a 50% chance at your marriage being one that results in lifelong partnership with someone you care deeply about seems like good odds.

    • PickTheStick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, the 50% statistic is from all marriages, not first-time marriages. The figure goes way up due to people being divorced, married, divorced again, ad nauseam. I remember the first-time marriage divorce rate being somewhere in the range of 27-33%.

      • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also out of that 33 I imagine a good chunk is people who were dating a couple months before deciding to get married, or those who got married because of an accidental pregnancy.

        If you take first time marriages, where they were dating for over 1 year, and did not conceive a child until after being married, I imagine it’s near 10%, maybe less, but I have no data to back that up.

        • PickTheStick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because it matters to the person in the category. If you’re a young lad or lass in love, and you are considering marriage, knowing that only a quarter of the marriages similar to yours end in divorce is a hugely different take than half of them.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I am non-monogamous in that I have several sexual partners at any time, as does my wife (were also swingers), but she is absolutely “the one” and I absolutely believe in the concept of one person for life.

    I do honestly believe in true love, a soul’s counterpart in another, it just happens that my personal one is also kind of a slut, too. It’s just another thing we have in common.

    Looking at divorce rates as a bad thing is misleading, imo. A high divorce rate isn’t necessarily bad. It’s people escaping bad matches,. It’s people learning and growing. It’s people still chasing that special thing that makes them say “holy shit I’ve found them.”

    Worth noting that I think there are many great loves people can have, and I was deeply in love several times before I was with my wife. It isn’t (and wouldn’t have been for me) “settling” to marry one of those great loves. Your One is what you make of it.

    • DudePluto@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      do honestly believe in true love… it just happens that my personal one is also kind of a slut

      I’m happy that I read this sentence in my lifetime

      Looking at divorce rates as a bad thing is misleading, imo. A high divorce rate isn’t necessarily bad

      Oh absolutely. I don’t mean to moralize or demonize the issue. I just mean that, seeing as how as soon as divorce became socially acceptable it shot up to 50%, I’m not sure how people can view it as unnatural, I guess.

      Also your story is very sweet and every bit of what I want one day, so thank you for sharing. You have an interesting perspective

    • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same boat. We may have other partners, but we are each other’s primary for a reason. Relationships come and go, but I cannot imagine a life without that woman.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where’s the 50% divorce rate from? I’ve heard this over and over for decades, but nothing to prove it.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        An oft-cited APA/census study found that 35-50% of first marriages end in divorce. That number goes up for subsequent marriages (~66%).

        I think it’s bad reasoning to suggest that a 50% divorce rate has any bearing on any given marriage, though. People marry and get divorced for a wide array of reasons.

  • funnystuff97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    To me, what you’re describing is exactly monogamy, but you’re classifying it wrong. Sure, you have a lot of partners before you find your “the one”. I’ve had 3 so far. But that doesn’t exclude you from monogamy once you’ve had your first partner, which is what you brushed off in your first sentence. Monogamy is one partner at a time, not that you find one person at the very beginning and get it right the very first time.

    The idea of finding “the one” is, to me, someone that I want to spend the rest of my life with. And it takes a long time to find that person. And there’s more than one “the one” out there! I know that sounds contradictory, but come on, there’s 8 billion people out there, any set of desirable traits you could write down are shared by who knows how many hundreds of thousands of people. So you date lots of people, get to know lots of people, and then when you find someone who checks all your checkboxes and who you can see living with til death do you part, then you stay with them.

    One might say one person for who knows how many dozens of years could get boring, or that one person at a time is too restrictive. To them I’d say, that’s fine, you’re polyamorous or something of the sort, and that’s okay. But to me, having one and just one partner is special. I’m entirely theirs and they’re entirely mine (in a romantic way, not a possessive way), and that’s just how I like it. I want someone, just one person, I can always rely on to watch a terrible movie with, always have a player two, always rant to or be ranted to, and so on. That’s what makes it special. The exclusiveness is part of the charm, I suppose-- it’s not just any old person they want, it’s me they want. And my feeling is mutual to them.

    I don’t think I wrote this exactly the way I wanted it to come out, and I mulled over it a couple times, but I hope I got my point across. Everyone’s different, and that’s okay.

  • who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Life is just easier when you have a good partner who has your back. Its hard and requires comprising sometimes. Just make sure your comprising on the small things and its great.

  • Duchess@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s not for everyone and certainly shouldn’t be seen as the default or indoctrinated into people from a young age like it is right now. that being said, i’m very happily monogamous and couldn’t imagine it any other way.

      • Duchess@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        nice! feel free to join if you’re looking for furry content. but yes, i feel very strongly about equality for my polyam friends.

  • dudinax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    The divorce rate is high because of a small percentage of serial monogamists. Most first marriages don’t end in divorce.

  • anewbeginning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because you don’t see it around you doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I’m from Portugal which has even higher divorce rates, and yet 90% of couples I know got together and stayed together and have absolutely stable family lives. The idea that it cannot be done(unless it’s done with no effort) is the main reason most couples fail to do it.

    • DudePluto@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t believe that it can’t be done, it obviously can. There’s just this idea that it’s the natural state, or what humans are instinctively given to, and that just seems… incorrect?

      • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re defining it as “is mandatory to shut down desire for other people after you pair up”, of course is wrong. It’s impossible.

      • Rocinante@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are you relying on for natural state? Other animals? They kill off other competitors. If humans let instincts guide their actions then there’d be more violence with emotions driving decision making than brains.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So I’ve reread this whole thread, and I do agree with you that monogamy is forced and unnatural, but I also accept that I am in the distinct minority there.

        The important thing is that there is no one right answer. You find what works for you, and a partner who wants what you want, and you make it work.

        The making it work is the key part here. I married my actual, literal best friend, and it’s still a lot of work. A lot of talking, assuming good intent when they hurt you, and trusting them to care enough to have your best interests at heart.

        It’s not easy and you’ll fuck up, and so will whoever you date, and that’s okay. Life is about learning and growing, and we all, always, have more learning and growing to do.

        Wishing you luck.

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m glad you posted here, because I happened to notice while reading wikipedia that Spain and Portugal have the highest divorce rates on the world, at 84% and 94% respectively. Obviously your personal experience doesn’t really align with this, but I did want to ask if anyone could help explain why the divorce rates are so high on the Iberian Peninsula.

      The idea that it cannot be done(unless it’s done with no effort) is the main reason most couples fail to do it.

      Strongly agree. But how does that idea take hold? Has Portugal always had elevated divorce rates or is this a recent development?

      I also wonder if it has any relation to the legal status of marriage and divorce. Perhaps it’s less costly to obtain a divorce in comparison to other countries?

      • anewbeginning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Divorce rates relate new marriages and divorces. In Portugal divorces have increased but even more importantly, new marriages have dropped a lot. That is the cause of the high divorce rate.

        As to why people get divorce I’d venture a guess of economic reasons. Portuguese are quite poor, particularly in the European context, and life has gotten even harsher this last decade. That breaks a lot of people.

        Natality rates are also low. Fewer babies, fewer reasons to stick together.

        Still, as I said, there’s no reason to be cynical about monogamy, love and marriage. Many people make it work very well.

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see. The prolonged harsh economic conditions do make a lot of sense as a reason.

          Still, as I said, there’s no reason to be cynical about monogamy, love and marriage. Many people make it work very well.

          You’re preaching to the choir, my friend. I totally agree.

  • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I’m a queer woman and I swear ALL OF MY FRIENDS are some level of poly. Which, rock on! Good for them! But my GF and I are happily monogamous and can’t imagine a future where we open it up. I have no shade, I’ve read the poly books, watched the open relationships YouTube and listened to the theroy, I totally understand where they are coming from and why it works for people. The divorce rate is a good enough example as any for why it makes people happy. Monogamy is not something to enforced or expected of people, clearly it isn’t working for most folk.

    But I also know any thing more than 1 partner just sounds STRESSFUL. Like, I always work myself up wondering if I am messing up ONE relationship, idk how y’all do it with multiple people to worry about. 😂

    • morphballganon@mtgzone.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      3 partners is easier than 2.

      More partners means more eyes ensuring everyone’s needs are met and everyone is being held to reasonable standards of accountability.

      Also more people to suggest good restaurants!

  • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, I started dating before the internet. Yeah yeah, I’m old, I know. Anyway, I always had this feeling of what if my partner finds someone better?

    Now with the internet people from all over the world are at your fingertips. Now, I feel like “this person could literally be with anyone in the world, but they chose to be with me”.

    But, also, in it’s most basic form a relationship is a situation where you find someone, and decide that you can put up with their bullshit, and hope they feel the same. I’m old enough, and have dated enough to know. All those people that you think are hot. Do gross ass shit behind closed doors, or some embarrassing ass shit.

    So, maybe you put up with her always wanting you to hang out with her while she poops. Meanwhile she puts up with your god awful laugh. Y’all do this because you know it can be so much worse, and besides the sex is good, and they have good taste in whatever interests y’all share.

    And for those of you that say I don’t do gross, or embarrassing stuff. Either you’re lying or delusional. We may call ourselves “humans” to make ourselves feel better, but we are disgusting animals that have to learn how to act, and most of the time the training is incomplete.

      • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hehehe

        I’ve been a house husband for the past almost 10 years. I get paid to cook, clean, take care of kids, and play video games. If I leave she’s stuck with a special needs kid all alone.

        On the other side. I haven’t worked in almost 10 years so my resume is lacking. So, we definitely have reasons to stay together, and not fuck it up, but our situation isn’t typical.

  • bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is not monogamy vs polygamy, the problem is to find the right person.

    Also, it is not a matter of finding “the one”. It is a matter of finding someone you can love. And then you need to learn how to get through shitty moments and love again.

    I don’t mean that you should stay in a toxic or dangerous relationship, but that it is easy to get angry and think that it’s over with someone, but in reality anger and love come and go. The thing is to understand why you love someone so you can love this person again and again.

    Now maybe some people are not like that and its good for them. But please don’t tell me that I should love several people at once or that I should consider relationships like a consumable thing. I am unable to do those things.

  • Dukeofdummies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, I just recently got married in July. We’d been together for 5 years before that point, we survived COVID in a rather stress inducing state.

    • My wife works in banking, with secrecy requirements. I work in AV, testing equipment that records everything it sees and hears. We couldn’t even be within earshot of each other. She was forced to work in her bed and I was forced to take up half the living room with 2 baker’s racks of AV equipment. Still went through those two years being able to look back fondly at being able to take a five minute break to scream into a pillow and get a hug after a particularly stressful problem, meeting, or office politics.

    I completely understand where you’re coming from, but just like how you can’t imagine a partner you want to spend the rest of your life with. I cannot imagine someone ever replacing my wife, and I don’t even want to entertain the notion of losing her.

    • well what if it’s insert_celebrity_crush_here?
      -- that’s not my wife, not interested

    • well what if it’s your wife but she never says no to you?
      -- that doesn’t sound like my wife at all, I’m not interested

    We just mesh incredibly well. We both grew up in problematic households with a disdain for our parents. We both grew up poor. We both care more about financial security and safety than trying to get it all. I feel like we’re a team, at all times. Not having her beside me would be like playing football with only half the players.

    I will say, this is gonna sound weird but stick with me. Don’t… don’t chase a monogamous relationship.

    I think too many people get hooked on this idea that you must have a partner. You must marry before you hit 35. You must fuck before you hit 19. Just don’t think so hard about it. Geography, life events, mistakes, opportunities, are all at place with literally everyone at all times. COVID especially through a wrench in every life plan in America. I feel so bad for anyone who hadn’t gone through college yet. Just… find enjoyment where you can and balance that with building your future and if both those points can be met with the same activity. DO IT. Whether it’s a partner that you can’t live without and you wanna keep, or a group you can’t live without. You need both those points in life. Do whatever makes sense.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe in monogamy, but not “soulmates” which seems to be what you’re talking about, here. If you conflate terms of course you’re going to wonder why so many people believe something… because they don’t, they believe in the other thing.

  • Codename_goose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess I’ll bite.

    I’ve been with my wife since high school and we married after 7 years. So all-in-all, in total we’ve been together 16 years and have one kid. After all of the time invested and my age now, having more than one partner sounds exhausting.

    If I was able to do it over differently, I don’t think I would. I grew up catholic, so the idea of monogamy was part of my upbringing. But having had access to the early internet I was exposed to just about anything you could imagine. Having read and listened to many people talk about poly relationships in my younger years, while enticing to have more than one partner, it still sounded harder to deal with or navigate than one person.

    • DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Similar boat - wife and I dated in high school, broke up, ended up at the same college later on and now we’re married with two kids (going on 15 years together).

      I married my best friend and I don’t need to worry about any weird landmines. No regrets.