

The Jumanji sequels. You are going to take a cult classic and “revive” it by changing the premise to be a video game? Stupid. But, it was much better than it should have been.
The Jumanji sequels. You are going to take a cult classic and “revive” it by changing the premise to be a video game? Stupid. But, it was much better than it should have been.
I would say they still are reluctant. Maybe less so. In modern conversatioms, there is a very subtle implication that acknowledging queerness is inappropriate unless very explicit - even then you will get comments like “they didn’t have the same understanding about orientation or gender identity”.
In otherwords, there is still a strong undercurrent that straightness should be the default, rather than just one of the options.
Also, if you are really concerned, but think youll have something like diesel available, EVs are still better as not only are they more flexible, but a pretty low cost multi-fuel generator could charge it.
Beyond the clear use of the word “person” - go ahead and tell me how you know if someone is not an citizen before you rescind your own requirement for due process?
Or, how many citizens should lose due process because you decide to skip it?
If you decide to provide exceptions, you will inevitably have a substantial error rate.
Of course, i suspect that is considered a bonus to these nazis.
The lack of food safety makes my eye twitch.
To be fair, Trek has a canonical nuclear war in like, 2026.
Oof. Such a bad idea. It does demonstrate that “We mostly care that they aren’t contributing to taxes” is just a garbage excuse.
Reading it, it seems to be more targeted as a team knowledge base tool than a word processor.
Supreme Court is still an important source of perceived legitimacy. The further authoritarians can push the Supreme Court to rubber stamp their power, the weaker public response will be.
Its similar to a form of “divine right” really.
Of course, the Supreme Court has to have its own trust and perceived legitimacy in order to convder it.
Lets say 5000 people see this post - should it be normal and expected that 5000 people spend their time hunting down a source to a claim, or have a single OP include it in their post?
The amount of handringing over it was always excessive. China has undergone a massive rural -> urban migration. They still are. The large majority of homes are being used, and more will continue to be. I feel like a china apologist here, but this narrative about ghost cities has always been very silly.
This is what basically worked a few years ago. Massive mess, a huge pain, but it worked.
Also, many times they will say some isn’t an authentic way to do something, and then you will learn it is authentic for like, a few towns over.
If this actually is about climate - China installed 50% of all new renewable capacity last year. 50% of the entire world.
Admittedly, not a vegan, but going after small-time hobbyists who, in the grand scheme, are both offering a more humane (if imperfect) and small scale approach is really really not a winning strategy for vegans who want to convince others of the ethical merits of veganism.
Before you come back with some line along the lines of “murder is murder” - if you, as an individual, convince one person to eat less meat you have done far more than you will ever do spending time focusing on this.
Focus on compelling arguments for veganism, not attacking small time people and families for their hobbies.
Please don’t spread misinformation about trade deficits. That is part of the “logic” that trump uses to justify US tariffs. Trade deficits are generally not all that important.
There are good reasons to switch from US goods and services - this is not one of them.
The lack of specificty is also a strategy used to bolster support for deregulation.
Simply say “we are eliminating regulations” , and dont ever talk about what you are deregulating, because actually many regulations are a net good for society and were implemented for a reason. Preventing companies from dumping poison is a regulation.
Tech has made things more efficient - the rewards of such are simply being funneled from the average person to the wealthy.
There are quite the number of fitness bands and watches that can do this too for android. No reason you cant set up a device to the opposite partners phone.