• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Speaking with the admins, I’m going to remove this comment based on this lemmy.world policy:

    https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/#2-respecting-other-users-privacy-doxing

    The phrasing is a little vague, there’s some discussion on re-writing it and what the definition of “publicly available” is.

    If things change and the comment is allowed under the new phrasing, I’ll restore it. For now we’re choosing to err on the side of caution.

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      or that it is publicly available information

      Isn’t it though? That’s sort of the point of the article. Also, his name is now publicly available many places.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re treating it like this, if reputable news sources aren’t allowing it, then we aren’t allowing it either.