• Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    alleged role,

    Until he’s been criminally convicted for it, it’s “alleged” in order to avoid defamation and libel cases.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      He was found by a trial and state supreme Court to have engaged in an insurrection. It’s not alleged.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        He was found by a trial and state supreme Court to have engaged in an insurrection. It’s not alleged.

        If you want to be safe from libel and defamation cases, it’s “alleged” until you’ve been found guilty/liable at trial, and that hasn’t happened to Trump yet.

        • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I don’t think that’s true. The Colorado state supreme Court says he engaged in an insurrection. Truth is a defense.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The Colorado state supreme Court says he engaged in an insurrection. Truth is a defense

            The truth is up to interpretation. You can say what you believe to be the truth, but somebody with a lot of money and access to experienced lawyers can cripple you with a lawsuit regardless.

            Do you really want to engage in a trial that could theoretically take years? Spending untold sums of money in order to defend yourself? Even if you will probably win, you’re tying up a lot of capital and manpower to fight it. For what? The difference between an article that has the word “alleged” or not?

            The risk-reward just isn’t there.