• Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    He was found by a trial and state supreme Court to have engaged in an insurrection. It’s not alleged.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He was found by a trial and state supreme Court to have engaged in an insurrection. It’s not alleged.

      If you want to be safe from libel and defamation cases, it’s “alleged” until you’ve been found guilty/liable at trial, and that hasn’t happened to Trump yet.

      • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that’s true. The Colorado state supreme Court says he engaged in an insurrection. Truth is a defense.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Colorado state supreme Court says he engaged in an insurrection. Truth is a defense

          The truth is up to interpretation. You can say what you believe to be the truth, but somebody with a lot of money and access to experienced lawyers can cripple you with a lawsuit regardless.

          Do you really want to engage in a trial that could theoretically take years? Spending untold sums of money in order to defend yourself? Even if you will probably win, you’re tying up a lot of capital and manpower to fight it. For what? The difference between an article that has the word “alleged” or not?

          The risk-reward just isn’t there.