• Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            10 months ago

            What planet are you on that you’ve never heard of the Canadian extermination of indigenous peoples?

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              10 months ago

              I have heard of it. Have I heard anyone call it genocide though? I don’t think I have. Other than, now this is the second person, whom I consider to be edgelords on the internet until proven otherwise.

              • Perfide@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                You’re willfully being ignorant, then. “Canadian indigenous genocide” is the third result down on the autocomplete list on google after typing in “Canadian Indig”, and if you click that result you get a ton of sources including a bunch of news articles talking about the genocide using the word genocide, the website for the Canadian human rights museum which calls it a genocide, and even a scientific paper on the trauma effects caused by it.

                It was a genocide.

              • theluckyone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Sounds like someone needs to be doing the Googling they keep preaching about.

                stares blatantly

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Canada’s policies aimed at assimilating Indigenous people included outlawing languages, cultural practices and political traditions and forcibly removing children from families. These were deliberate attempts to erase a distinct group of people by destroying the essential foundations of their way of life.

                  I read enough studying law and before that criminal justice with a history minor to know that this quote is completely true and not really that strong of a case by an international law standard. I get their argument though and have a lot of sympathy for the indigenous people throughout North America and the arctic.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    “There are a lot of innocent people who are in trouble and dying,” the president said in a session with reporters.

    Gee, then maybe you shouldn’t have cut funding to the biggest single relief agency in the area just because Israel told you to (archive part 1, part 2), you fucking clod

    e; Six pages of evidence (archive) about 12 people in an organization of 13000 that we probably didn’t even see (archive) and a bunch of disinformation from Israeli mouthpieces was all it took

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You don’t have to prove with links that we did that. We were joined in it by a broad, multilateral coalition of partners.

      Those who saw the raw intelligence said it was irrefutable and the problem was significantly more widespread than the 13 people directly accused, all of whom the agency immediately fired upon also seeing the intelligence.

      • CabbageRelish@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        This is ass backwards. UNRWA immediately fired the accused employees solely because they were worried about the potential ramifications and figured it wasn’t something worth fighting. They had and have seen zero actual evidence to back it up. Meanwhile, half the west stupidly took this as evidence that the allegations were true and pulled their future funding, while they too have seen zero actual evidence to back up Israel’s claims.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The IDF came to Washington and showed Congress and the IC the texts, social media messages, and cell phone location data, which was described by people briefed as “highly credible” and “irrefutable.”

          Anthony Blinken’s State Department, Joe Biden’s admin, and the foreign affairs committee immediately pulled the money. If the evidence they saw could rationally be disregarded as “stupid,” which is your assessment, even though you yourself have not seen the evidence, you are suggesting what exactly, that the cell phone metadata, social media data, and text logs–which sufficed to put the US government into immediate action–were completely forged? You think the DNI and CIA Director got fooled as to the credibility of the intelligence, but not you, you know the truth? That sounds pretty insane.

          Occam’s Razor: largest employer in a tiny area, terrorist group is extremely popular in that area, some of the employees are accomplices and co-conspirators to that terrorist group?

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Half of the budget that was cut was from the USA alone, about 29% of their annual, only 9 nations withdrew funding total.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Biden is SO CRITICAL of Israel that he’s ready to send them BILLIONS more dollars without Congressional Approval! THAT will teach Israel to STOP!

    • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeha, he’s just making sure he wins the next elections. He knows this is one of the reasons why people won’t vote for him. The fact he is keeping it this tame just shows he really doesn’t want to affect his relations with Israel. So, after he wins, everything will stay the same way.

      • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m guessing you’re his biographer? Maybe his therapist? Are you him?

        Gotta be one of the three to know so much about what his intentions are.

        • pickman_model@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not really. The war in Gaza is unpopular among the population, but there is pressure for him to send aid to Israel. There are not many ways to slime that one out and have a chance to win the upcoming election. Speak loudly what the masses want to hear, do what he needs to appease the more powerful people who can screw him over.

          He’s a politician after all, his priority is to maintain power at home, not to stop the war in Gaza.

          • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, it isn’t. It’s just easy to jump to that conclusion when you start there and work your way back.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Technically he sold them weapons previously, not given them billions, although in the voted down bipartisan border bill the concession of billions given are for Israel AND Palestine humanitarian aid.

      He’s still a piece of shit, but nuance matters imo.

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    “over the top” is a bit tame in my opinion. i would frankly go as far as to say what they’re doing is “not cool”, maybe even “uncalled for”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Stop talking and pull the aid. Nothing Biden says on the subject matters while he’s still sending them aid.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also, he should reinstate funding for UNRWA and stop aiding the IDF effort to starve everyone in Gaza (*also applicable here in Canada and several other countries). Even if the Israeli allegation that UNRWA staffers are all Hamas-affiliated was true, we’re talking about fucking food, medication, and survival essentials for 95% of the world’s most starved people (up from 80% as of recently).

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    *strong finger wagging and stern look intensifies*

    *wink* *nod* [keeps sending Israel bombs to use against civilians in Gaza]

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    What he needs to say is, “You’ve had your fun. Stop now. If not, we’ll invade.”

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Could just demand the immediate resignation of Bibi and his government as a prerequisite for a continued alliance, but that would require a spine.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes. Alliances are mutual pacts, and can be broken by either party when the other becomes objectionable or unprofitable. Or just because.

            I personally consider “being a genocidal fascist abusing the alliance to cement his rule” a deal breaker that can only be resolved with the removal of the offending party from power.

            You don’t?

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              So your approach to weilding America’s strength and good will, in the name of human rights, is to abandon allies over 35,000 deaths, most of which are civilians? Okay that’s one approach. Not sure how our other allies will feel about it, whether they might stop working with if we try to dictate how they decide to prosecute a war on their border.

              What are you going to say to any emerging powers that are considering whether they want to be part of the western world or if they want to hitch their wagons to Chinese or Russian power? How will you live with yourself when you realize your emotions over 35,000 deaths caused you to end the very alliance that stops tens of millions from dying in an Iranian war and the cascade of failed states that would follow?

              “Being a genocidal fascist”? Who specifically are you even talking about? Israel is a democracy. They don’t have just one person in charge. Are you talking about Netanyahu? You’re going to blow up an alliance and risk tens of millions of lives because you don’t like one politician, whose entire party seems likely to be defeated at the ballot box? How about giving it one election before we try severe sanctions and whatever else you are suggesting America should do to overthrow a leader and party that was democratically elected because it won’t do what we want?

              Seems incredibly ignorant and short sighted, something a kid might suggest.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Yes, we absolutely should “abandon” genocidal fascists - who demand billions of dollars in military aid to make everyone in the Middle East our enemies.

                That’s called “Not being evil people that deserve bullets to the face.”

                But, hey, it’s a free country, it’s your right to be on the side of fascism while patting yourself on the back for the mental maturity of defending the status quo at all costs.

                One might even note there’s a whole political party for your kind!

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yep, they’re already struggling as it is. If they had to fight house to house with just rifles they’d stand no chance.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Are we continuing on the series for Biden’s campaign ads?

    “You all thought he was supporting genocide but look he is slapping Israel’s wrist! There you go, now you can vote for him with a clear conscience”

    • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      True, but at least he isn’t the orange orangutan that wants to kill democracy.

      It’s so fucking depressing when you have these two as the most likely candidates and the only third option is so unknown that most people won’t know who they are and even less vote for them.

      Hell, even the NYT doesn’t show de la Cruz in the running - https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/us/politics/presidential-candidates-2024.html

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unfortunately the US elections often come down to voting for the person you dislike less.

      Do I like his stance on Israel? No

      But his opponent (Trump) stance/actions is worse

      So I will hold my nose and do my civic duty

      • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Basically.

        It felt awful voting for him the first time. Now? Lol. You have to keep perspective that this countrys official stance on Israel from the start has been unwavering support. I think even if we got Bernie in 16 he would have found it hard to do much with this one. Congress would still foot the bill no matter what he did or said. Israel has been a geopolitical oasis for US foreign policy, and say what you will about US foreign policy, but abandoning a long term ally weakens your soft powers exponentially.

        And on that note, abstaining from voting or voting for the nuclear cheetoh because US foreign policy is horrific is ensuring we do/enable far, far worse. And if youre counting on a revolution in the age of drones to occur after the public is fed up with trump and lgbtq folks are in cages, i got news for you: we have absolutely none of the systems in place to care for a populace after all the current systems at play would die in this supposed revolution.

        God. Its just frustrating. I get it, i hate US neoimperialism too, but did u miss the bit where the other big players have their populace more under their thumbs? Bc at least here u still have a functioning vote. If u dont throw it away, that is.

      • Crow_Thief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why do you think trump would be worse on israel? Hes the only president in 50-100 years not to start a war. He got us out of afghanistan. Hes not telling the israelis they have our full throated support. And even more importantly, I cant think of a single way for him personally to get rich off of the israeli genocide, so I can only assume he would have zero interest in prolonging it. Like, honestly, he seems like the least bad option weve had in a long time, because we know exactly how he will behave, and its certainly not as bad as all of the presidents who oversaw mass killings. He will be a buffoon, and he will probably attempt another coup. So what? You think the FBI cant contain a second coup, which they are now expecting? If thats the price we have to pay to get a president who doesnt openly support genocide, im more than willing to pay it.

  • CliveRosfield@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow he said a slightly negative sentence about the terrorists he promised to limitlessly fund that genocides brown people. If anybody was wondering why he’s unpopular it’s this shit.

  • UmeU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think it was the great philosopher Eric Cartman who said it best

    “You people who are for the war, you need the protesters. Because they make the country look like it’s made of sane, caring individuals. And you people who are anti-war, you need these flag-wavers, because, if our whole country was made up of nothing but soft pussy protesters, we’d get taken down in a second. That’s why the founding fathers decided we should have both. It’s called “having your cake and eating it too.”

    Don’t get me wrong, I am definitely a soft pussy protestor, but Biden is clearly having his cake and eating it too.