• mihies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well, no. Sadly we don’t. At least not in the range needed. All of these require either specific geographic relief, something really huge, too expensive or combination. Perhaps the most promising is the green hydrogen, but then again, we have yet to see it at such scale. I’d love to be wrong, though.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      something really huge

      yeah, we use a lot of energy, absolutely every form of energy production we have involves really huge things. Massive mines, dams, pipelines, oil rigs, nuclear cooling towers, fossil fuel power plants, oil tankers. They just have to be built. we can excavate dams, build solid weight lifting facilities, molten salt storage, make arrays of flywheels. There’s a ton of answers to energy storage already, they dont involve resources with any kind of scarcity, they just have to be built.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Big construction involves environmental concerns, that’s why we don’t have many new dams nowadays