• Nate Cox@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This layout makes sense if you have used an old school mp3 player or similar.

    Volume is left and right because it’s an analog of the volume bar on the screen.

    Up and down is previous and next because play was controlled by a list UI so you were moving a cursor up and down between songs.

    It’s not how I personally would prefer it, but it’s not as outlandish as it seems.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I still feel like this is sillt… I’ve owned a lot of mp3 players and none of them worked this way. Was this a zune thing or something?

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Every mp3 player I owned in the 2000’s worked this way. Screen above, controls below, list UI for tracks, usually volume rocker or dial on top.

        Sometimes the UI would be more complicated and would include a left/right button for navigating horizontal menus (like my all time favorite Zen Vision:M) but the basic playlist was still a vertical scrolling list UI.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    I want to know why do many cars don’t have a play/pause button on the wheel, but do have a source button.

    I change my source from my phone exactly never. I want to pause the audio all the time.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nailed it. Even the worst interface with buttons is miles away from the best touchscreen interface. You are like driving, you aren’t supposed to look at the screen and tap things on it to switch a song or whatever. You navigate a missile that weights at least two tones and can undo a crowd of pedestrians or break a wall in a building. You are in no position to focus on this tiny LED that some insane idiot mounted there. Yet, it’s there.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Made by people that use a volume slider and swipe for next… Such a horrible design in cars.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    At least you have those ridges dividing the directions. My car has similar but oriented correctly and no ridges. All too often I skip to next when trying to increase volume. It’s really annoying

  • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Same as my Toyota. It’s a crazy indicator of how we expect things to be, but it’s absolutely not a deal breaker.

    • empty04@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      My Tacoma, as well. Recently, I modded that to function correctly (up/down vol, R/L track). Easily the best $50 I’ve spent on the vehicle.

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I drove this make of car for a while; there’s an optional head up display where the up and down buttons here let you cycle through contacts/the song queue/radio stations. I’d imagine it’s the same interface without it, just displayed somewhere in the car where you’re not looking while driving.

    Having it so that up/down moves you up/down through the list when there’s a visual display is way more intuitive than up/down being volume - frankly the volume bar on Windows, Mac, many TVs etc. goes from left (quiet) to right (loud) anyway

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yet one more item in an endless exhibit of how mankind is unable to standardize anything at all. Get TWO engineers together to agree on ONE standard plug and the assholes will come out with THREE separate plugs, completely non-compatible with each other, of course.

    It’s almost like a miracle that we got the world to agree on certain things like time and timezones, a system of coordinates, the metric system.
    All of them received initial pushback, and some to this day. Noisy, noisy fucking humans.

    Did you know that for a few decades, every town in the UK kept two different times on adjacent clocks? Back when their railway grid was expanding everywhere. Local time and London time.

    • DokPsy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Funny enough, it’s not the engineers that are doing it. Left to their own devices without ridiculous constraints like “someone else is doing it this way so we need you to do something that sets us apart” or “you can’t look at what everyone else is doing”, engineers will do it the laziest way they can… By copying what others are doing and essentially making it standard.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah usually when engineers take extra effort to do something non-standard, it’s at a specific request from a client or management