RainfallSonata@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 10 months agoChick-Fil-A staff in the rain.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square222fedilinkarrow-up1755arrow-down140
arrow-up1715arrow-down1imageChick-Fil-A staff in the rain.lemmy.worldRainfallSonata@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square222fedilink
minus-squaremy_hat_stinks@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up31arrow-down11·9 months agoYou’re assuming to get to a location you need a car, that’s still car-centric design. If your primary argument for drive-throughs relies on the fact that you needed a car to reach the location in the first place then you’re missing the problem.
minus-squareMamertine@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down4·9 months agoThe person’s point stands if they were on a bicycle. You can’t just leave a child in a bike carrier at the bike rack.
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 months agoNot after that chewing-out by the police department, I can’t.
minus-squareuis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down6·9 months agoCan you imagine doing such scary thing as WALKING?
minus-squareBoxtifer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·9 months agoPutting a child in and out of a bike carrier is a ton easier compared to a car seat. It’s not really an issue.
You’re assuming to get to a location you need a car, that’s still car-centric design. If your primary argument for drive-throughs relies on the fact that you needed a car to reach the location in the first place then you’re missing the problem.
The person’s point stands if they were on a bicycle. You can’t just leave a child in a bike carrier at the bike rack.
Not after that chewing-out by the police department, I can’t.
Can you imagine doing such scary thing as WALKING?
Like a peasant?
Putting a child in and out of a bike carrier is a ton easier compared to a car seat. It’s not really an issue.