• Tujio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Basically? It was a kids movie. Characters were one-dimensional and not very likeable to teenage me. Exposition by dialogue, and not great dialogue. Slapstick bits that really didn’t land (Jar Jar). Etc, etc.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Even as a child when I first saw Phantom Menace, I thought it was off. Maybe I would have rated the film lower if it weren’t for the fun pod racing segment and the fight with Darth Maul. I think the Star War prequel trilogy excel more on the editing and choreography of action scenes than actual story telling and drama.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And the originals weren’t kids movies?

      I guess the massive amount of Star Wars toys I had as a child somehow led me to believe otherwise.

      Original trilogy are also kids movies, fight me.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Granted, I was like 4 when it came out so it still holds some fondness in my view. Qui-Gon was like the father figure I always needed but never had, and Jar Jar laid the foundation for my sense of humor. Maybe that’s why no one thinks I’m funny…

    • golli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      But imo at its core it still has a good idea, unlike the sequels, which really are just style over substance. Which is why i can forgive the prequels quite a bit more, especially considering Geroge Lucas did try to get other directors onboard to make them.