• CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    Fury Road 2: They got rid of a lot of the practical effects that made the first one great. The plot and pacing was off. I was just annoyed because of how much I liked the first one.

  • Ihnivid@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s been a while, but that would be Sin City 2 for me. Back then I was young and naive, and didn’t know that 99% of sequels are soulless cashgrabs. And I was really hyped, I loved the first one and still think of it as the best comic book adaptation I’ve ever seen. You could see the love in every frame.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Unpopular opinion for the cinephiles, it would be Stalker by Andrey Tarkovsky for me. It’s overrated and it’s just a bunch of guys talking. I wouldn’t have mind the philosophical talks if it weren’t for the pointless long shots that spanned for minutes. And it is not even clear if there is actually supernatural, or scifi or none of those.

  • ⠀Q⠀@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    X-Men Phoenix - such a great grafic novel arch and solid movies before that flick. Phoenix writing and acting saddens me.

  • Xed@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The Avatar the last air bender ( live action ) movie. I was a child when the movie came out so I had no clue who the director was and how shitty of a movie I was in for. The ending recked me since it didn’t even have a satisfying conclusion. Just pure garbage

    I was in genuine shock of how bad of a movie I’d gotten into. Never again

  • Maestro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker. I went in with very low expectations and it still managed to disappoint so badly that it makes me angry. I hate how the Palpatine plot point retroactively ruins the entire original trilogy.

    • Ihnivid@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      My biggest problem with this is that Luke’s character just got completely butchered.

      You really want me to believe that one of my childhood heros, who against all odds, against his mentors judgement, decided to go all in on the “There’s good in my father, I’ll save him or die.”-train would grow old and wants to kill his own fucking nephew because he’s seeing something evil in him?

  • golli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    22 hours ago

    For me it might be the Hobbit Trilogy.

    The LotR Trilogy are my all time favorite movies and the contrast couldn’t be greater. Really goes to show what a perfect storm it was that we got the movies we got with LotR.

    • kossa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      There’s a fan cut out there on the high seas, where they basically condensed those three shitty movies into one which follows the book as close as possible. That one is bearable and as far as I am concerned the official Hobbit movie now.

      • golli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Maybe in the sense that they were aiming to be a long epic similar to the LotR, rather than the fun adventure the book that the Hobbit book is. But i’d say that there are far more issues than just that.

  • popcar2@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The Matrix Resurrections. I already had a feeling it would suck but it managed to be worse than I could ever imagine, they weren’t even trying to hide how much of a cashgrab it is.

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The previous two were utter dogshit… how could you expect anything different?

      • popcar2@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Matrix 2 & 3 were masterpieces by comparison, not as good as 1 but they were at least enjoyable.

        • IWW4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          They were steaming piles of dogshit…

          There was nothing enjoyable about those dogshit movies.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    “Sky Captain And The World Of Tomorrow.”

    The beginning is great. Giant robots attacking New York.

    Then it just becomes boring and ridiculous.

    Posters promised Angelina Jolie. she shows up for five minutes and doesn’t do anything.

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Not saying you’re wrong, but praising the giant robot attack on New York before swerving into critiquing the latter half of the movie for being ridiculous is a funny juxtaposition.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Here’s the way I look at it.

        A fictional story should follow its own rules. Let’s take “The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.” The idea that someone would let himself be hung, trusting the other guy to be able to make that incredible shot over and over and never miss, is nonsensical. But we in the audience accept that premise for the sake of the story. We’d be disappointed if, halfway through the movie, an orchestra appears in the middle of the desert and they do a big musical number.

        “Sky Captain” was ridiculous because of the way the story kept shifting and the rules kept changing.

        • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I admit that I saw Sky Captain once, many many years ago, so I’m not going to be able to back this up with too many specific citations, but you’ve also not said specifically what rule they set up and fail to follow, so we’re even.

          It’s a pastiche of pulp fiction concepts from the 30s-50s. Giant robots, airships, Nazi scientists, Shangri-La, dinosaurs, android assassins, the works. The whole thing is like a loving homage to Doc Savage’s greatest hits. I don’t see how any of that “breaks rules”.

          Like I said, I won’t dispute your overall finding of the film being, “meh”. I watched it once 20 years ago and haven’t gone back since, so I’m not exactly leaping up to defend it’s execution, but I also think “the rules kept changing” is an empty critique, as it stands currently.

            • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              You’re under no obligation to continue the discussion, sure, but it seems disingenuous to me to open a thread saying “Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is a bad movie because it fails to follow it’s own internal logic”. Then, upon having that assertion challenged, you jump to, “I’m not gonna argue about this.” Like, why comment at all if you’re not interested in discussing, and yes, maybe even defending, your take? Regardless, if that’s not what you’re here to do, have a good day.

  • Tujio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I know that knocking on it is overdone, but Phantom Menace. I was 13 when it came out, huge Star Wars fan, absolutely target market. Walked out so sad and confused.

      • Tujio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Basically? It was a kids movie. Characters were one-dimensional and not very likeable to teenage me. Exposition by dialogue, and not great dialogue. Slapstick bits that really didn’t land (Jar Jar). Etc, etc.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Even as a child when I first saw Phantom Menace, I thought it was off. Maybe I would have rated the film lower if it weren’t for the fun pod racing segment and the fight with Darth Maul. I think the Star War prequel trilogy excel more on the editing and choreography of action scenes than actual story telling and drama.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          And the originals weren’t kids movies?

          I guess the massive amount of Star Wars toys I had as a child somehow led me to believe otherwise.

          Original trilogy are also kids movies, fight me.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Granted, I was like 4 when it came out so it still holds some fondness in my view. Qui-Gon was like the father figure I always needed but never had, and Jar Jar laid the foundation for my sense of humor. Maybe that’s why no one thinks I’m funny…

        • golli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          But imo at its core it still has a good idea, unlike the sequels, which really are just style over substance. Which is why i can forgive the prequels quite a bit more, especially considering Geroge Lucas did try to get other directors onboard to make them.

  • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Gladiator 2. If anyone can do spectacle, it’s Ridley Scott. But good goddamn, the action in that movie sucked so hard. And all the best lines were quotes from the original. Denzel was the only half enjoyable thing because I think he realized how bad the movie was and just had a blast with it.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Violet Evergarden: The Movie. My heart sank when I realized exactly where this was going, after all of her character development that’s the ending they decided to undermine it all with.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It made me want to never re-watch the series, too. The pedophilic undercurrent to the movie makes parts of the show so, so, much worse.

  • IanTwenty@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Once Upon a Time in America. Maybe I watched a bad version but it made little sense and the ending was dreadful.

    Reading about it right now on wikipedia I probably saw the ‘condensed’ version which was savaged by the critics:

    Some critics compared shortening the film to shortening Richard Wagner’s operas, saying that works of art that are meant to be long should be given the respect they deserve. In his 1984 review, Roger Ebert gave the uncut version four stars out of four and wrote that it was “an epic poem of violence and greed”, but described the American theatrical version as a “travesty”. Furthermore, he gave the American theatrical version one star out of four, calling it “an incomprehensible mess without texture, timing, mood, or sense”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Once_Upon_a_Time_in_America

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It is the most overrated movie of all time. Four hours of nothing… every single scene is 5times longer than it needs to be.