• billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The Nobel organization should rescind her award and give it to someone else. Now he just has a gold necklace and not an official Nobel Prize.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I said it before but I’ll say it again, she deserves a Peace Prize just for shutting up that crybaby by giving hers to him.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      He is a bottomless pit of selfish needs, though, so even if he is ridiculous enough to accept a trophy regifted to him as the same thing as one awarded to him, he’ll want another.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I honestly don’t know how the Onion is going to beat this.

    Heck, I don’t know if future students of history are actually going to be able to believe the history books about this decade, should they be written with any sort of accuracy… Reality’s jumped the shark.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Some 30-35 years ago there was a commando of (mostly child) soldiers running around naked because it makes them invulnerable, or so their leader claimed. Then he went on forcibly apologizing to people whose family members he’d killed and/or eaten. Oh and he’s an evangelical street preacher.

      Reality has never been not weird.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Of course they will. Political leaders in the past have done many many bizarre things.

      • Australis13@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Oh, I know, but most of the time they’re remembered for only one or two things. I have no idea how the history books are going to handle the shear number of unhinged things Trump and co have done.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          They’ll gloss over a lot of it just like they do with Hitler. You hear about the big things like the beer hall putsch, maybe the street fighting, the Nuremberg laws, kristalnacht, maybe the nighr of long knives, the concentration and death camps, the blitz, the attacks on western and Eastern Europe, and the seige of stalingrad. That’s a lot, so they often don’t address stuff like the bizarre structure of nazi command (it was far more about who could claim to have the ear of who than a rigid structure), the fact that Goering was an opiate addict from the time he joined the party to the time he was hanged for it, the fact that the party was super anti drug and Hitler and his wehrmacht were on meth, the fact that anti semitism basically gave the united states nukes thanks to brain drain, the insistence on spreading efforts into many super weapons rather than committing to a small number given all the resources they could possibly need, the fact that Himmler was a weird nerdy loser whose power came from being the least obviously threatening option to many party members…

          Or we could go to WWI Germany, because Kaiser Wilhelm was barely discussed in my history classes other than just him being in charge and having been largely led by the actually competent Bismarck, but this guy was a weird crazy little motherfucker. And I mean that in a “this guy was attracted to his mom” way.

          Ooh or you could look at the Roman Empire, the whole empire is largely glossed over with a bit about the Julians then Constantine and Justinian and the fall of the western empire. But like, a decent portion of the roman emperors were some variety of bonkers according to the history (but roman historians are much more like highly partisan propagandists than dutiful recounters of happenings).

          In short, people already forget his scandals from a year ago, much less last term. Many books will be written about him, but ultimately his primary strategy is “flooding the zone” ie keep doing controversial shit that gets your name in the news so nothing is able to stick, and if it does then who cares, that means nobody’s reporting on your current bad thing. The internal crackdowns will be condensed and simplified to major turning points and the external aggression will be condensed and simplified similarly. And in that way the next fascist movement will involve the “you’re exaggerating” for years before it becomes “yeah, so what”.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Should have made a fake one with a little radioactive bit inside.

    I mean who would check ?

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Unfortunately, she’s literally a fan of Trump. Not just because of the recent events either. She’s a hardline rightwinger from a rich family.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Airport security would detect that. Radio-isotope poisoning is a favorite of the Russians, I’m sure the White house has multiple layers of detection set up for exactly that kind of thing.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean they would check for bugs but radioactive?

        I don’t think trump uses airport security checks.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I mean, even a security theater as incompetent as the TSA would catch this kind of thing. The White House security would probably know about it before the medal even made it in the same building as trump.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is more pathetic than getting sports trophies off of Freecycle and claiming you “won” all of them. What a pedophile loser!

  • santa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It means nothing because it can’t be given to anyone other than whose won it. Like you can’t give the medal of freedom to Oscar the Grouch.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    22 hours ago

    JFC, how pathetic this guy is.

    That’s not how medals work, asshole.

    Who would have thought a guy practically in the Silent Generation would have pined for a participation trophy? Such a loser.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Not even a participation trophy. I have recieved exactly 1 trophy in my life. It was a 1992 participation trophy for playing 1st grade basketball as mandated by the school.

      But I DID play the season of basketball. I DID participste.

      Show me where trump has participated in acts that promote peace.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        What ending the wars in palestine, syria, lebanon, yemen, palestine again, yemen, lebanon, then iran, then palestine aren’t good enough for you?

        Well do not worry he may be ending wars this year in venezuela, cuba, mexico, canada, denmark, and iran again. /s

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          There’s 195 countries in the world and we’re engaged in like 7 different wars so that’s 188 wars that Trump has prevented by not randomly deciding to attack them /s