Federal charges. Which, like duh. He’s going to be charged by the state, though
Vigilante justice could be a good option.
This alleged vigilante is innocent. The prosecution didn’t make their case.
I support this
We’re all the frog in the pot.
Why dont we try “One of Us, All of Your’s” then? Like Noem touts on her fucken podiums.
I think she’s trying to chant “one of us gobble gobble” like the rest of the circus freaks.
It was just printed on her podium. Doesnt matter where it comes from. Nasty shit coming from the head of a powerful institution. Maybe it was a bad move leaving those laying around.
I think it’s important to remember that that quote LITERALLY comes from Nazi Germany.
No it doesnt, not verbatim. It may capture Nazi ethos and actions but it is not a direct quote from what I can dig up. A similar spanish quote was apparently used by Spanish fascists in the 1930s, “Uno de los nuestros vale por todos los vuestros”, which is pretty much the same thing. But the factoid everyone seems to be passing around about an SS Officer being killed is incorrect.
Well shit. Color me surprised, the internet lied to me.
That’s said, if that’s how they feel, I will agree. We will do the same. Every fascist must be removed from the earth.
Here’s a historical analysis of the question I thought was interesting. Even though the idea that the Nazis coined the specific phrase is baseless, they did threaten and practice that sort of retaliation.
It may be hard to believe but fascists do have a place in the world. Its at the bottom of the Mariana Trench with no equipment.
Make court justice unreliable and folks will simply resort to street justice.
Seems to be the obvious choice every day.
Hey that is what the KKK did … vigilantism.
And of course the X-Men … another popular vigilante group
Sadly, only one of those groups are considered to be terrorists, and it’s the mutants.
Sort of. It’s kind of like the “cult” vs “sect” vs “religion” distinction; it’s just a question of scale.
So when it’s only a couple inbred, racist fuckwits, it’s “vigilantism”. When it’s half the population of the country, it’s “civil unrest”.
Circular family tree logic
The fucking downvotes on this. Lmao. That’s exactly what the KKK did.
And not only them, obviously. White supremacist vigilantism has been a problem for a very long time.
They even brought out a noose during January 6th to reference their favorite how-to book! The Turner Diaries. “Day of the rope” and all.
I love how the fediverse pretends they’re smarter than other social media and you can’t help yourselves with the petty downvotes. Reddit leaks.
The KKK also uses the internet, so you should stop using the internet too or you’re just like them.
The state will have to file if the attorneys want to be re elected.
They talk about investigating, there is nothing to investigate we have multiple videos. The only thing to investigate is the law and how it plays out with the federal agent in a state.
The state will have to file if the attorneys want to be re elected.
Never mind reelection; they need to file if they want to continue to exist in society at all. That point needs to be impressed upon them, emphatically.
LegalEagle has a video breaking down the video and discussing the laws pertaining to this. https://youtu.be/7AQbhes-Ntw
This was a good video 🙂
Why would they charge the Gestapo officer for following The Party Directives?
If anyone thinks he’ll face charges at federal level, they’re delusional.
What about a civil suit?
Maybe her family could make him and his family poor for life.
It doesn’t substitute for Ms. Good’s life in any way, but it does a mote of justice.
We could burn his house down
As far as I know no charges have happened for the franklin park guy that was murdered by them or the woman filled full of holes or the recent couple that was shot. I seriously don’t get trumps supporters.
What’s the statute of limitations? It does not matter how long it takes this murderer will pay for his crimes
There is no statute of limitations on murder.
Every state and local official who fails to prosecute is also guilty and should be dealt with accordingly.
They need to be scared not to do their job.
Has anyone doxxed this piece of shit yet?
His bosses did
I read that it’s largely due to established precedent that in cases where a police officer shoots a driver, (happens enough for there to be precedent) the burden of proof is to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the killer did not have cause to fear for their life. Proving something to not be the case is very difficult.
Lucky for us we have the whole thing from multiple angles, including the murderers POV because he whipped out his phone because he wanted a video of the murder that he premeditated.
It’s a high bar, but this is one of the most documented murders in history.
I’ve seen all the videos and unfortunately there is JUST enough to cast reasonable doubt. I know it’s bullshit, you know it’s bullshit, everyone involved knows it’s bullshit, but they can absolutely argue that he “feared for his life”. Her wheels were 100% turned away from him, but was he in a position to examine the angle of her wheels when the car started moving? Or did he just react when the car started moving after he put himself less than a foot from the front corner?
Again, it’s obviously bullshit. He murdered a woman. He willfully put himself in that situation and ended her fucking life because he’s a fucking coward. For drawing his gun alone, he should be prosecuted, let alone firing point blank at an unarmed person posing no threat. But with the amount of leeway the justice system gives law enforcement, he will absolutely be able to argue that he had “reasonable fear” in the moment.
The legal standard isn’t if he was afraid it’s if a reasonable person should have been afraid. That’s a big fucking difference.
Not for law enforcement
At least let the jury decide.
I don’t think thats true.
He violated official policy, and it’s obvious to anyone with half a brain that forcing a driver to slam on the accelerator (due to being dead) can only make the situation worse.
I don’t think he’ll face charges, but I’m wary of what you remember reading somewhere.
He literally had gotten video of her license plate prior to shooting her. He had no need to put himself in front of her car while other officers were screaming at her to drive away. They could have gone after her later, as is typically done with anyone not considered seriously dangerous that is operating a vehicle, but he chose to get in front of her and start shooting when she complied with the order to drive away
Maybe the first shot. The two through the driver’s window make it murder.
