Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1402arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1400arrow-down1imageThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareiamthetot@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·4 days agoThis is not a defense of the fascists, but calling it a “sprint” up to her car is as disingenuous as saying the officer was “run over”.
minus-squareruuster13@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoHe trotted then. Whatever. There was excitement in the approach.
minus-squareiamthetot@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·3 days agoIt was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.
This is not a defense of the fascists, but calling it a “sprint” up to her car is as disingenuous as saying the officer was “run over”.
He trotted then. Whatever. There was excitement in the approach.
It was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.