Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1405arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1402arrow-down1imageThe party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.lemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareiamthetot@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·6 days agoIt was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.
It was an aggressive approach, but it’s not “whatever”. Words matter. You lose credibility when you accuse the other side of lying for a political point, then you lie for a political point.