Did you understand that anyone who actually knows something about it also knows that sex is more complicated than you claim? Did you understand that you’re being a complete arse to trans people? Wait, yes, you knew that one. That was the deliberate part.
I understand that you’re unable to use your definition to untangle the real chart. It’s OK, I knew that you wouldn’t be able to, and I also knew that you wouldn’t be able to admit that you can’t, because I also know that you want to win more than you want to be right. You’re quite happy to be wrong as long as you’re winning.
One day you may realise that truth and people are more important than winning, but that day is definitely not going to be today, and definitely won’t be written about using the powerstruggle account. Do you think that Charlie kirk realised that his loyalty to winning arguments was misplaced as he was dying, or do you think he died happy for a cause he believed in - the right to bear arms no matter the consequences?
I understand that using reason, logic, truth and sense to debate with you was a waste of time and that we continue to disagree about sex. You claim there are only two sexes yet you are unable to demonstrate that on the real chart and you are unable to see that your eleven charts would be tangled up if you drew them as one diagram with one node each for each set of chromosomes, but there I go, talking logic to a bigoted troll who wouldn’t admit they were wrong under any circumstances whatsoever, because truth matters to them less than “winning”.
Did you own the libs again, powerstruggle? Did all the little red downvotes on the rest of the conversation prove you were winning your little war against the libs?
I don’t think you’re very good at spotting when I’m being facetious and when I’m making a serious point. Let’s try again.
Hahahahahahahaha powerstruggle can’t even tell the difference been TEN and TWO!
Your diagrams overlap a lot and it’s a lie to say that you have disentangled the real chart when you have ignored and omitted details that don’t fit with your oversimplified untestable pseudoscience.
I didn’t slap anything on anything. Do you understand that those charts don’t each represent a different sex?
Did you understand that anyone who actually knows something about it also knows that sex is more complicated than you claim? Did you understand that you’re being a complete arse to trans people? Wait, yes, you knew that one. That was the deliberate part.
Do you understand that those charts don’t each represent a different sex?
I understand that you’re unable to use your definition to untangle the real chart. It’s OK, I knew that you wouldn’t be able to, and I also knew that you wouldn’t be able to admit that you can’t, because I also know that you want to win more than you want to be right. You’re quite happy to be wrong as long as you’re winning.
One day you may realise that truth and people are more important than winning, but that day is definitely not going to be today, and definitely won’t be written about using the powerstruggle account. Do you think that Charlie kirk realised that his loyalty to winning arguments was misplaced as he was dying, or do you think he died happy for a cause he believed in - the right to bear arms no matter the consequences?
Do you understand that those charts don’t each represent a different sex?
I understand that using reason, logic, truth and sense to debate with you was a waste of time and that we continue to disagree about sex. You claim there are only two sexes yet you are unable to demonstrate that on the real chart and you are unable to see that your eleven charts would be tangled up if you drew them as one diagram with one node each for each set of chromosomes, but there I go, talking logic to a bigoted troll who wouldn’t admit they were wrong under any circumstances whatsoever, because truth matters to them less than “winning”.
Did you own the libs again, powerstruggle? Did all the little red downvotes on the rest of the conversation prove you were winning your little war against the libs?
Do you understand that those charts don’t each represent a different sex?
I don’t think you’re very good at spotting when I’m being facetious and when I’m making a serious point. Let’s try again.
Hahahahahahahaha powerstruggle can’t even tell the difference been TEN and TWO!
Your diagrams overlap a lot and it’s a lie to say that you have disentangled the real chart when you have ignored and omitted details that don’t fit with your oversimplified untestable pseudoscience.
Do you understand that those charts don’t each represent a different sex?