• lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Etymologically, it’s the genitive s, always has been. Since genitive s is usually written with an apostrophe, there is no reason not to do it with pronouns

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Since genitive s is usually written with an apostrophe, there is no reason not to do it with pronouns

        The genitive is consistently not written with an apostrophe for pronouns, for good reason. Want the pronoun “he” to be “hi’s” as a possessive? lol

        • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          The genitive is consistently not written with an apostrophe for pronouns, for good reason.

          Which is? You can’t just pretend there is a reason and hope people will give it a pass.

          Want the pronoun “he” to be “hi’s” as a possessive?

          But “his” isn’t “he” + “s”, neither historically nor morphologically (

          hint

          look at the vowel, it’s different

          )

          Historically, the possessive form both masculine and neuter singular was “his” in Old English and Middle English until “it’s” replaced the neuter form in late 16c. with a clear genitive 's ending. Even later (19c.), the apostrophe became less common but there is no good reason not to revive it. source

          But I guess you’re not too much into etymology or historical linguistics. Most pendents aren’t because once people look too much into it, they realize how anti-science their smoggery is and they adopt a more descriptive and non-judgmental view. Take that from a former pedant.