• lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Etymologically, it’s the genitive s, always has been. Since genitive s is usually written with an apostrophe, there is no reason not to do it with pronouns

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Since genitive s is usually written with an apostrophe, there is no reason not to do it with pronouns

      The genitive is consistently not written with an apostrophe for pronouns, for good reason. Want the pronoun “he” to be “hi’s” as a possessive? lol

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        The genitive is consistently not written with an apostrophe for pronouns, for good reason.

        Which is? You can’t just pretend there is a reason and hope people will give it a pass.

        Want the pronoun “he” to be “hi’s” as a possessive?

        But “his” isn’t “he” + “s”, neither historically nor morphologically (

        hint

        look at the vowel, it’s different

        )

        Historically, the possessive form both masculine and neuter singular was “his” in Old English and Middle English until “it’s” replaced the neuter form in late 16c. with a clear genitive 's ending. Even later (19c.), the apostrophe became less common but there is no good reason not to revive it. source

        But I guess you’re not too much into etymology or historical linguistics. Most pendents aren’t because once people look too much into it, they realize how anti-science their smoggery is and they adopt a more descriptive and non-judgmental view. Take that from a former pedant.