“It’s not about drugs. If it was, Trump wouldn’t have pardoned one of the largest narco traffickers in the world last month. It’s about oil and regime change. And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn’t. Especially to distract from Epstein + skyrocketing healthcare costs,” she claimed in a social media publication.
I mean, you don’t actually expect that to be possible right? Think of the implication that would have, where republicans would just arrest the president for wearing a tan suit.
I get that these are more obvious crimes, but the idea that a single member of the house could mobilize any kind of force to arrest the sitting president is insanity.
Which is more insane:
A member of congress operating unilaterally to arrest members of the Executive branch to halt their criminal actions?
Or the Executive branch acting unilaterally to wage war illegally on a sovereign nation?
You’re missing my point. A singular member of congress has zero authority, nor avenue to accomplish, arresting a sitting president. It isn’t just “it isn’t done, don’t do that” it’s “there’s no way to accomplish that.”